[Speaker A] [663.940s → 765.910s]: It's rap.
[Speaker B] [842.650s → 864.330s]: It's.
[Speaker C] [933.240s → 935.160s]: Buenos dias distinguidos delegados.
[Speaker A] [935.640s → 999.210s]: A very good morning. Distinguished delegates, I Declare open the fifth meeting of the sixth committee for the 80th session of the General Assembly. Distinguished delegates, this morning the Committee will first continue and conclude its debate On Agenda Item 109, Measures to Eliminate international terrorism. After which we will take up the consideration of agenda item 137, programme planning. And then, in accordance with our program of work, we will commence our consideration of agenda item 84, the rule of law at the national and international levels. As just announced, the Sixth Committee will continue and conclude its debate On Agenda Item 109, Measures to Eliminate international terrorism. The report of the Secretary General on this item is contained in document A80,177, which is available on the website of the sixth committee. The first speaker on the list is the distinguished representative of Libya. You have the floor.
[Speaker B] [1009.130s → 1442.610s]: In the name of God, most compassionate, most Benevolent. Madam Chair, at the outset I would like to congratulate you on your election to lead the proceedings of this committee. I also congratulate the other members of the Bureau. We wish you every success as you fulfill your mission. Libya, despite the exceptional circumstances it's facing, is doing its utmost to combat terrorism and extremism. We're doing this on the basis of a comprehensive approach, bringing together legislative, security and military measures. Our principal position is based on a rejection of violence and terrorism. The very cultural identity of Libya is based on moderation, a rejection of violence, hate and incitement to terrorism. For this very reason, my country is working within relevant international frameworks for countering terrorism and preventing violent extremism. Emphasizing criminal justice systems, we condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, irrespective of who the perpetrators are or what their motives are. We would like to reiterate that this is a global phenomenon which should not be associated with any specific religion. We would further like to recall that our country has undergone very difficult times due to the actions of various terrorist organizations over the last few years. A number of Libyan cities bore the brunt of this phenomenon. We've managed to vanquish some of the most threatening organizations and we sacrificed a lot for this. The objective was not just the undermining stability and security of Libya. This organization wanted to commit bloody acts which have nothing to do with Islam. Despite these difficult circumstances, we are capable of combating these terrorists, terrorists who are trying to turn the situation in the country to their advantage. Against this backdrop, we'd like to reiterate our condemnation of terrorism in all its forms. We stand in solidarity with victims and their families. The fight against terrorism requires an international approach that's comprehensive, bringing together political and legal dimensions. We must also combat terrorism financing as well as any other kind of support furnished to terrorists. There are various transnational criminal organizations who are involved in human trafficking so as to finance their terrorist activities. We must put an end to these financing flows and ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. In keeping with international law, the Security Council has set up basic parameters entreating the international community to continue combating terrorism within the framework of international cooperation. From a legal standpoint, it's necessary to fine tune the relevant international legal framework, and this through the adoption of a Convention on Combating International Terrorism, so as to hone the definition of terrorism from a legal standpoint and to garner consensus on such a definition. We need to bridge all of the gaps which terrorists are turning to their advantage. What's more is this must not be done at the expense of human rights, nor the rule of law. The fight against terrorism requires full respect for international human rights law and international humanitarian law, the goal being to guarantee the legitimacy of measures taken and avoiding fuelling extremism. Further, various international bodies have called for a balance to be struck between bolstering security on the one hand and respect for fundamental rights on the other. For this reason, we need to take action across the following pillars. First, strengthening legal cooperation between states, in particular with a view to bringing criminals to justice. Second, enhance supervision, that is financial oversight, especially that involving the use of digital tools for financing. Third, capacity building of various countries, especially on criminal justice. We need to ensure proper border patrols and to combat illicit financial flows as well. Fourth, strengthen international legal frameworks, especially in cyberspace, the objective being to avoid these technologies being harnessed to terrorist ends. Fifth, strengthen prevention by combating social exclusion and discrimination of all kinds. On that note, it's necessary to help victims and to ensure all persons affected by terrorism are reintegrated into society. Against this backdrop, we believe that the Sixth Committee is the best setting for us to deliberate the most relevant legal mechanisms, most effective legal mechanisms. Therefore, what's required is transparency. We must take into account the various legal regimes in our countries. Madam Chair, when discussing terrorism, we must of course refer to the crimes committed by the Israeli entity, which is sowing famine in Palestine before the eyes of the world. Today, a number of humanitarian organizations have gone to Gaza aboard vessels to put an end to the siege and to place the spotlight on the suffering of civilians. There are many doctors and human rights Defenders in their ranks aboard these vessels. These vessels were intercepted. And for that reason it is necessary for the international community to intervene so as to protect civilians and ensure unfetter deliveries of humanitarian assistance. Now, this initiative is not simply a voyage that humanitarian personnel has organized. This is a very human initiative that is being undertaken in full respect of international law. For that reason, we must intervene with a view to protecting innocent civilians. We should continue our efforts so as to guarantee the Palestinian people with the inalienable right to self determination and to establish an independent state with Jerusalem east as its capital.
[Speaker A] [1444.610s → 1759.210s]: Thank you, says the Chair to Libya. I now give the floor to Paraguay. I wish to extend our congratulations upon your appointment as Chair and extend this also to all members of the Bureau. What's more, we wish to underscore the fact that we stand ready to collaborate with all of the members of the Board during this session of the Sixth Committee. Paraguay strongly rejects all forms and manifestations of terrorism, regardless of where they occur. The global dimension of this phenomenon shows our responsibility, our shared responsibility to fight against a threat that imperils international security and undermines fundamental human rights. We thank the Secretary General for his report contained in document A80177 on measures adopted on a national and international level to eliminate international terrorism. Paraguay reaffirms its commitment to continue to strengthen and implement policies that can prevent and combat terrorism in all its forms. I wish to highlight once again that the Republic of Paraguay is continuing its fight against terrorism and its financing as a priority in our national legislative framework. We are signatory to the main international legal instruments in this area and we reaffirm our commitment to continue to adapt and to implement these provisions pursuant to the current challenges and needs, including them fully within our domestic legislation. Given the global nature of this phenomenon, international cooperation is essential in order to effectively combat terrorism. It's crucial to promote exchange of information and intelligence, to share successful experiences and to strengthen coordination between different countries and organisms, which empowers our response capacity in terms of our national strategies. In order to achieve this, it's essential to ensure that relevant stakeholders commit together globally, including civil society, the media and regional entities. Paraguay is doing this since we're part of the Inter American Counterterrorism Committee and the Financial Action Group for Latin America. GAFFI Lat. Just to cite some examples of the bodies that are working in our region. Chair, we understand that capacity building is fundamental for effectively overcoming terrorism and violent extremism. In this regard, we believe that it's vital to strengthen spaces of cooperation and coordination between UN offices and competent national institutions in order to boost and improve national capacities. In this regard, Paraguay believes that it is of the utmost importance to ensure that there is cooperation between the UN Counterterrorism Office and the Paraguayan institutions tasked with preventing terrorism and its financing in terms of the management and implementation of programs and projects related to security, border management and the fight against the financing of terrorism as well as the strength the capacity building for domestic institutions in general. We believe that the role that our organization plays is fundamental in terms of the way it articulates international efforts to combat terrorism, fully respecting international law and the UN Charter. In this regard, we highlight the relevance of the ninth review of the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy planned for 2026. What's more, we underscore the fact that we stand ready to participate constructively in the debates of the Working Group set up for this agenda item pursuant to Resolution 79 129. Which is why it was decided to recommend that the six committee establish a working group during the 80th session of the General assembly in order to finalise the process to draft the draft General Convention on International Terrorism and also deliberations on a topic related to the convening of a high level conference under the auspices of the un. By way of conclusion, we reiterate that international coordination cooperation are fundamental pillars for effectively fighting terrorism. Joint efforts between states and international organizations enables a more robust and articulated response to the threats posed by terrorism in its different forms. Paraguay recognises and actively supports all initiatives geared towards strengthening international cooperation in this regard. Convinced of the fact that it is only through willingness that we can move towards the eradication of this scourge. Thank you very much. I thank the distinguished representative of Paraguay for your statements as the Chair and I now give the floor to the distinguished delegate of Kenya.
[Speaker D] [1760.650s → 2072.939s]: Thank you, Madam Chair. As this is the first time Kenya is taking the floor wish to join other delegates in thanking in congratulating the Chair and the Bureau for the election to guide these deliberations this session and wishes you success and assures you of Kenya's support. Madam Chair. Kenya aligns itself fully with the statements delivered by Cameroon on behalf of the African Group and the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non Aligned Movement in condemning terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and wishes to add the following. Kenya has been greatly impacted and suffered the brunt of terrorism from the 1998 bombing of the US embassy in Nairobi to the 2019 bombing of the Dusit Hotel in Nairobi. Besides the spate of other attacks Terrorism has left a permanent mark and suffering on many innocent children, men and women. Kenya's geographical proximity to conflict ridden region made it susceptible to spillover effects from neighboring Somalia. Instability making counterterrorism efforts even more complex. The rise of extremist groups like Al Qaeda and Al Shabaab has heightened security situations and concerns resulting in a range of attacks that have targeted public spaces, government institutions and international interests within Kenya. To fight and compare these menace, Kenya has implemented several strategic measures which include enhanced intelligence gathering and information sharing among security agencies increased border security enhancement to prevent the influx of terrorists and light weapons established community policing initiatives to foster local cooperation conducted public awareness campaigns to educate citizens on reporting suspicious activities collaboration with international partners for counterterrorism training and resources. Besides conducting military operations, Kenya has also carried out legal reforms aimed at equipping law enforcement agencies with the necessary tools to prevent and respond to terrorist threats. The passing of the Anti Terrorism act of 2008 is one such intervention designed to empower authorities in their fight against terrorist activities. Other capacity building initiatives have entailed the establishment of well trained and equipped anti terrorism organizations, to wit, the National Security Intelligence which was created to identify threats, collect and analyze intelligence the National Counter Terrorism center established to develop a long term CET strategy, collect intelligence and coordinate regional city airports the Anti Terrorism Police Unit set up to plan and execute anti terrorism operations, among others. Madam Chair Kenya has also enhanced its Counter Terrorism and Counter Financing of Terrorism legislation by amending the Anti Terrorist act of 2008 and the process of Crime and Anti Money Laundering act to enhance investigative and prosecutorial capabilities of law enforcement agencies. However, despite these efforts, challenges abound in ensuring the proper implementation of these measures. Given the evolving tactics of terrorist groups and the complexity of their networks, the resilience of terrorist organizations and changing typologies in terrorist financing, the organized and in some cases sporadic occurrences of terrorist attacks highlight the need for continued vigilance and adaptive strategies to counter the dynamic nature of terrorism. Kenya's experience and Score the broader global reality that eradicating terrorism requires international and multifaceted approach that combines law enforcement, intelligence sharing, socioeconomic development and international cooperation to effectively address the root causes and manifestation of this complex threat. Madam Chair, no country is immune from terrorism or the effects of terrorism. Though terrorist attacks may be localized, their effects are global in nature. It is the more reason why there must be a concerted international and coordinated approach to counterterrorism. In this regard, Kenya supports the establishment with Working Group on Counterterrorism during this session and efforts to develop a comprehensive convention for combating terrorism. Thank you, Madam Chair.
[Speaker A] [2078.299s → 2087.179s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Kenya for your statement. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Sudan. You have the floor.
[Speaker C] [2096.000s → 2521.240s]: Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, I am honored to congratulate you on your election to the Bureau of the Sixth Committee. I would also like to congratulate all the other members of the Bureau. We are confident that your wise leadership will lead the Committee's deliberations to constructive conclusions that enhance its role in safeguarding international law and its norms and principles. My delegation reaffirms its commitment to working with you towards that end. My delegation also thanks and appreciates the United Nations Secretariat for its valuable efforts in preparing the report provided under this item of the agenda entitled Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism contained in document A80 177. Sudan associates itself with the statements delivered by the delegation of Cameroon on behalf of the African Group, the delegation of Saudi Arabia on behalf of the States of the OIC and the delegation of the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non Aligned Movement. Madam Chair, Sudan pays special attention to the issue of combating terrorism and violent extremism due to its firm belief that this scourge knows no geographical or cultural borders and this scourge affects all the peoples of the world without distinction. We are working within the international system to fulfill our legal and moral obligations under the framework of the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy in cooperation with the competent organs of the United nations and at the national and regional levels. In this context, my delegation welcomes the eighth review of the Strategy and calls for an approach of openness and consensus in the negotiations for the ninth review to be held in 2026. This ninth review will coincide with the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Strategy. We affirm that the periodic review of this strategy is an urgent necessity to ensure that it keeps pace with emerging challeng and the concerns of Member States. My country, through various international and regional fora, has maintained a principled position towards the issue of international terrorism on the basis of the following principles. Firstly, unequivocal rejection and condemnation of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations as a flagrant violation of international law and a direct threat to international peace and security. Secondly, the need to address the deep root causes of terrorism, including poverty, economic marginalization, the illegal use of force, foreign occupation and discrimination. Thirdly, the importance of strengthening international cooperation within the framework of international legitimacy and under the auspices of the United nations in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter, the provisions of international law and relevant instruments. Fourthly, the encouragement of dialogue among civilizations, religions and cultures and deepening the values of tolerance and coexistence and rejecting hate speech and extremism. Based on these pillars, Sudan has established a number of national mechanisms to guide its counterterrorism efforts, most notably the National Counterterrorism Authority and the Financial Intelligence Unit. We also established specialized security and legal institutions working in close coordination with regional and international partners. Sudan's National Counterterrorism Strategy was designed on the basis of partnership between the government and society in all its sectors by focusing on key axes that include dialogue and conflict prevention, strengthening governance, the rule of law, human rights, empowering youth and women, promoting education, skills development, and the effective employment of modern means of communication. This strategy focuses on a number of objectives aimed at addressing the conditions conducive to terrorism. Foremost among these objectives are the consolidating the sovereignty of the state and its institutions and its right to defend itself against the imperialist designs of some states in the region. Region Sudan is currently facing an external war of aggression by militias that use terrorist tactics against civilians with support from an external state that uses state terrorism against us. Second, combating organized and transnational crime. Third, achieving social justice and poverty alleviation 4 strengthening the social fabric and national cohesion. 5 developing a national culture based on moderation, dialogue and the rejection of extremism. The strategy also paid special attention to strengthening capacities in the areas of combating cybercrime and money laundering and the financing of terrorism. We have also paid attention to empowering civil society organizations, research centers, and national media to play an effective role in awareness raising and in education. Madam Chair, a comprehensive approach to tackling terrorism and violent extremism is the best approach to combating these phenomena. Addressing these phenomena cannot be limited to security and military tools, but rather requires addressing the social, economic and cultural causes that give rise to them. In this sense, we believe that combating poverty, achieving sustainable development and supporting reconstruction programs in developing countries, especially in Africa, constitute an essential entry point to dry up the sources of terrorism and build up a more just and balanced international order. Sudan, while renewing its commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms, affirms that these national efforts require technical support to build national capacities and strengthen international cooperation based on mutual respect and non infringement on international sovereignty. We also affirm that the success of these efforts requires true partnership among the states, civil society, academic institutions, research and media centers, and others in monitoring and analyzing these issues and proposing sustainable solutions. In conclusion, Sudan reaffirms that international and regional cooperation is the best means to confront the threat of terrorism and strengthen collective security, provided that this is done with respect for international law, human rights and the principles of the UN Charter. In this spirit, Sudan will continue its tireless efforts regionally and internationally to contribute to building a more secure, peaceful and just world. Thank you, Madam Chair.
[Speaker A] [2525.960s → 2535.190s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Sudan for his statement and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Georgia. You have the floor.
[Speaker E] [2543.430s → 2584.250s]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Georgia aligns with a statement delivered by the European Union and I would like to add few remarks in my national capacity. Georgia is not stranger to all the security challenges faced by the international community. Therefore, we have always been committed to strengthening global security as well as to the notion of collective defense while dealing with our common enemies. Our participation in the Iraqi Mission and the NATO led operations in Afghanistan, the International Security Assistance Force and the Resolute Support mission with the highest number of.
[Speaker F] [2584.250s → 2586.190s]: Troops on the ground is a vivid.
[Speaker E] [2586.190s → 2673.790s]: Demonstration of this effort. Georgia continues to implement national counterterrorism strategy of 2022-2026 and its action plan overseen by the Permanent Interagency Commission as well as a National Strategy on the Prevention, Detection and Suppression of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation of Weapons of mass destruction for 2023, 2026 and its corresponding action plan. Both strategies highlight the respect for human rights in the implementation of measures aimed at countering terrorism. Georgia introduced substantial amendments to the National Counterterrorist legislation to criminalize the travel and movement of foreign terrorist fighters as well as enhance the security of the state border. Madam Chair, Russia's illegal occupation of Georgia's territories Abkhazi and Schinuali region weakens Georgia's national security in many dimensions, including in the context of international terrorism. Considering Georgia's strategic geographic position as a critical transit route between Europe and Asia, the occupied territories might be used for illegal activity through such as trafficking and trade in arms, components of weapons of mass destruction and as a corridor for overriding terrorism related sanctions.
[Speaker F] [2674.430s → 2684.070s]: Prevention and response to nuclear and radioactive threats are among the main elements of Georgia state security. Thanks to the effective measures carried out.
[Speaker E] [2684.070s → 2726.350s]: By the Georgian law enforcement agencies, illegal activities have been successfully prevented. Between 2021 and 2025, the State Security Service of Georgia identified and prevented five cases of illegal trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials. Eight individuals were brought to criminal responsibility. The most recent operation was carried out on 17 July 2025 during which an attempt to illegally sell nuclear material, specifically uranium, was sorted. A total of 360 grams of depleted Uranium was confiscated during the operation.
[Speaker F] [2726.750s → 2729.950s]: Madam Chair, in conclusion, let me reiterate.
[Speaker E] [2729.950s → 2737.710s]: Georgia's steadfast commitment to the continued efforts of the international community to prevent and counterterrorism. I thank you.
[Speaker A] [2741.790s → 2750.350s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Georgia for his statement. And I now give the floor to the distinguished delegates of Gabon. You have the floor.
[Speaker B] [2752.910s → 3015.170s]: Thank you very much. Madam Chair. I'm absolutely honored to see you chairing our proceedings. I'd like to reiterate our congratulations to you and all members of the Bureau. My congratulations also extend to the Secretariat, members of the Secretariat here in the room, but also members of the Secretariat behind the scenes. They've done a stellar job coordinating our proceedings, and it would be remiss of me not to thank all of the interpreters for the essential role they are playing in multilateralism. Day in, day out, they are helping us to lift linguistic barriers. My delegation would like to align itself with the statements delivered by Cameroon on behalf of the Africa Group and Iran on behalf of naming Madam Chair. Terrorism continues to weigh heavily on international peace and security, throwing up many challenges for states, in particular those in conflict areas. Terrorists are conducting their activities through all kinds of means, including transnational activities. Thus, terrorist groups are exhibiting a capacity to adapt. This can be seen in their ability to tailor their tactics, to modify their strategies in the face of counterterrorism measures and the splintering geographical splintering of their networks. This makes the terrorist threat more diffuse and complex. As many other delegations said before me, I'd like to emphasize that no cause, ideology, religion can be used as a pretext for bloody terrorist attacks perpetrated across the world, targeting law enforcement and civilians, irrespective of the country in question. These vile acts show to what extent the perpetrators hold human life in contempt, as they do the values to which we are committed. Gabon would like to unequivocally condemn all of these terrorist attacks, the objective of which is to so fear we reiterate our solidarity and support to countries and people who've fallen victim to these barbaric acts. My delegation would like to use this opportunity to reaffirm that terrorism should not be associated with any religion, civilization or ethnic group. Madam Chair, given the universality of the terrorist threat and new technologies, no nation, large or small, can be safe from this scourge. In parallel, we see genuine asymmetry in terms of the counterterrorism means at our disposal. In 2006, in September, we adopted the Global Counterterrorism Strategy. In so doing, the member states of the United nations reiterated their commitment to combating international terrorism holistically. The momentum this created helped us to consolidate the legal framework and the means we have at our disposal to fight this tentacular phenomenon, terrorism and this by reviewing the strategy every two years, we support the approach of the African Group in the run up to the ninth Strategic Review. Effectively combating transnational terrorism thus requires a holistic approach and appropriately tackling socioeconomic challenges many states are facing by paying close attention to the root causes youth education, improving living conditions as well. Furthermore, we need to strengthen the fight against transnational trafficking which is used to finance terrorism. We note that on top of the sizable means at terrorists disposal, there's also the sophistication of their modus operandi. Therefore, we would like to call for the strengthening of developing countries capacity, specifically taking into consideration the specific challenges the developing countries, in particular African countries face. Therefore, we need to do everything within our power to overcome the differences in our approaches, which for some time have thwarted our efforts to finalize a comprehensive convention on international terrorism. Madam Chair, by way of conclusion, I'd like to state that our common action against terrorism should be part and parcel of our commitments to respect human rights and combat poverty. The fight against terrorism is a collective responsibility. My country has ratified the majority of terrorism related instruments. We thus reiterate our commitment to contributing to the global effort to combat this loathsome phenomenon. I thank you.
[Speaker A] [3018.850s → 3031.810s]: I thank the distinguished delegate of Gabon for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Lao People's Democratic Republic. You have the floor.
[Speaker D] [3049.500s → 3362.270s]: Madam Chairs. Madam Chairs. At the outset my delegation wish to join other speakers in congratulatory congratulating you and other members on your election to the sixth committee of 80 session. We have full confidence in your leadership and assure you of our full support and cooperation. My delegation aligns itself with the statement delivered by Cambodia on behalf of ASEAN and Iran on behalf of nams. My delegation knows that the terrorist act constitutes a frequent violation of international law. Violate human rights, threatens social unity, stability of state and regional and international peace and security and hinders socio economic development. Therefore, on acts of terrorists, regardless of who commit, when and where happened, are never justified and should be condemned unequivocally. Madam Chairs, the Lao PDR attach great importance to prevention, addressing and elimination of terrorism by taking all measure to fight against terrorists. Following the adoption of new amendment to the Law on anti Money Laundering and financing of Terrorists by the United nations by the National assembly in July 2024 early this year, the Lab government adopt the Decree on Counter Financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and decree on stopping, seizing and freezing funds for people involved in terrorists and financing of terrorists. In addition, the Anti Money Laundering Intelligence Office in collaboration with the United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime has established a system for alerting and checking the name list under restrictions by the United nations due to their activity related to financing of terrorists and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, the LA PDA has organized number of workshops to raise awareness on entry money laundering and financing of tourists for officers in line Ministry to enhance their understanding of their mandates and obligations regarding the implementation of domestic law and international treaty related to anti money laundering. Madam Chair, the terrorist is a global issue which no single country could effectively address or prevent these challenges alone. Therefore, it is indispensable that international community at all levels to continue to strengthen collective efforts and cooperation in combating this critical issue. And in doing so, we must continue to address the terrorists, among other things, by first, taking and addressing the root cause of tourism, including address the socioeconomic disparity, extreme poverty, preventing conflicts and ensure social justice. Second, enhancing resilience of community, creating favorable conditions for all people in exercise of the fundamental rights and freedom and promoting education for children and well being for all people, particularly vulnerable group and youth. Third, punishing perpetrator in lines with international law, particularly international human rights law, refrains from applying double standard and dragging terrorists with any religion, nationality, civilization or any ethnic group for strictly respecting and upholding the principle of national sovereignty and territorial integrity and the shadows of United nations and international law in combating terrorism. Madam Chairs, currently the threats from acts of terrorism and violent extremism remain continue to evolve, becoming increasingly dynamic and complex. Therefore, it is necessary for the state and international community to have effective measures to address it, including information sharing, capacity building and transferring technology to developing country, especially for small and landlocked developing state. In conclusion, the La PDI is committed to fight against terrorists and reaffirm its unwavering commitment to work closely with international community and relevant stakeholders to combat terrorism. I thank you.
[Speaker A] [3367.310s → 3870.920s]: I thank the distinguished delegate of the Lao People's Democratic Republic for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished permanent representative of Costa Rica. Costa Rica. Your Excellency, you have the floor. Madam Vice Chair, Costa Rica congratulates you and the other members of the Bureau upon your election and wishes you every success in leading the work of this Commission. You have the full support of my delegation. Costa Rica reiterates its strongest and unequivocal condemnation of terrorism in all of its forms and manifestations. We reaffirm that terrorism must not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group. This phenomenon constitutes a constant threat to human life, to international peace and security, and the full enjoyment of human rights and sustainable development. All states, directly or indirectly, have suffered the consequences of this phenomenon. That's why the international community, with the United nations at its center, must ramp up their efforts in order to combat this ever evolving threat. Costa Rica thanks the Secretary General for his report, which provides an updated overview of national and international measures against terrorism. We highlight the strengthening of legal frameworks, judicial and financial cooperation, prevention efforts, the signing of multilateral and bilateral treaties, as well as the active role of regional organisations. The report also underscores the 55 international instruments that make up the global legal framework. For this debate, my delegation would like to make the following four observations. First, throughout its eight decades of existence, the United nations has been essential in building a global legal and institutional framework to confront terrorism. From the adoption of the first sectoral treaties to the 2006 Global Counterterrorism Strategy, the organization has promoted multilateral cooperation, information exchange, the strengthening of national capacities, and the integration of approaches based on the rule of law and human rights. These efforts have enabled significant headway to be made in criminalizing offences, freezing assets, controlling illicit financing, judicial and police cooperation, and the consolidation of regional and global prevention platforms. However, the changing nature of threats, along with new methods of radicalization and violence, requires us to constantly renew and adapt our responses. Second, a major pending challenge is the absence of a consensus based intergovernmental legal definition of terrorism. This lack has led to ambiguities that allow for arbitrary or discriminatory uses of the term, including the criminalization of legitimate fundamental freedoms and freedom of expression. In some contexts, human rights defenders, civil society organizations, indigenous peoples, labor activists and minorities have been subjected to such practices. This instrumentalization contradicts the very purpose of the fight against terrorism, undermines human rights, weakens democratic institutions and affects vulnerable populations. Costa Rica believes that it's a priority to move towards a clear and legally binding definition that could serve as the basis for a global convention on terrorism. We support the proposal to convene a high level conference under the auspices of the UN in order to formulate a comprehensive, coherent and non discriminatory international response. Third, the international community must adopt decisive actions in order to prevent and respond to the malicious exploitation of emerging technologies for terrorist purposes. Innovations such as generative AI, autonomous systems, advanced encryption tools, cryptocurrencies and digital platforms offer undeniable opportunities for human development. But if misused, they can also amplify capabilities for planning, recruitment, disruptive propaganda through deepfakes, decentralized financing, and the execution of terrorist acts on an unprecedented scale. The proliferation of improvised armed drones and the manipulation of dual use technologies are clear signs of this trend. There is an urgent need to strengthen regulatory frameworks and international cooperation to ensure that technological development is accompanied by ethical, legal and security safeguards in full compliance with international law and human rights. The nexus between terrorism and cybercrime, coupled with the proliferation of cross border digital sanctuaries, erodes the ability of states to attribute, prevent and prosecute these threats. It is essential to strengthen international cooperation through mechanisms such as Interpol, the Global Counterterrorism Forum, and public private partnerships with technology platforms. We must adapt regulatory frameworks, including resolutions 1373, 2341 and 2396 of the Security Council to these emerging threat vectors, particularly through technical assistance and capacity building for states with limited resources. Fourth, effective counterterrorism requires a comprehensive approach that places people, human rights, and the rule of law at the centre of our actions. We must put the human cost of terrorism at the core of our policies and work with civil society, community leaders and local actors to address structural factors that drive violent extremism such as poverty, social exclusion, inequality, hate speech, rights violations and democratic deficits. Sustainable responses are those based on democracy, the rule of law, transparency, accountability, gender sensitive approaches. Counterterrorism measures must never, ever be used as a pretext to violate human rights because respecting human rights is the cornerstone of effective and legitimate responses. By way of conclusion, almost two decades after the adoption of the global counterterrorism strategy, we acknowledge important progress. However, there are also significant gaps that must be addressed. Ahead of the Ninth Review. Costa Rica calls for constructive negotiations that will allow us to refocus our efforts on addressing the root causes of violent extremism, strengthening respect for international law, including promoting a whole of society approach that effectively integrates a gender perspective in the framework of the UN80 initiative. We believe this is not a time to scale back multilateral action with the United nations at its core, but rather it is an historic opportunity to renew our commitment and to build a more comprehensive, coherent and effective international response that is firmly grounded in human rights. Thank you very much. I thank you, your Excellency, for your statement and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Republic of Tanzania. You have the floor.
[Speaker D] [3874.280s → 4195.180s]: Madam Chair, it is my honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the United Republic of Tanzania. We congratulate you and the Bureau on your election and pledges Tanzania's constructive engagement throughout the session. Equally important, we commend the Secretary General and the Secretariat for the well detailed report containing document A8 177 and its addendum. My delegation aligns itself with a statement delivered by Cameloon on behalf of the African Group and Elan on behalf of the Non Alan movement and wishes to make a few remarks at its national capacity. Madam Chair, with today's technological advancement, Taylorism has transcended borders, making it a true global threat. No nation is immune to its devastating impact as evidenced by the rising number of indiscriminate attacks against innocent civilians worldwide. This alarming reality calls for urgent, unified and sustained international action. Taylor List networks continue to exploit modern communication tools, our polar borders and interconnected financial system to spread their ideologies and operations. Acknowledging this, Tanzania remains actively engaged in regional and international efforts to address root cause and eliminate international terrorism in all of its forms and manifestation. Madam Chair, the ongoing trend of radicalization and violent extremism with radicalization of UC joining terroristic groups and becoming fallen terrorist fighters poses significant threat. However, the 2022 Tanzania Nationalist cassette indicates that Tanzania is at a medium low risk. Despite this promising assessment, Tanzania is taking all necessary steps to review and improve its existing policy strategies, legal and institutional framework to combat the escalation of extremism and radicalization which may lead to the formation of terroristic groups in the country. During the reporting period, Tanzania took several initiatives in line with the four pillars of the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy of 2006. The key reforms include amendment of the national laws in line with the FATIF recommendation on terrorism financing, economic sanctions and the protection of victims and witnesses. A national review of terrorist financing risk among nonprofit organizations was completed along with outreach program for NPO supervisors and the designated non financial business and professionals. Thirdly, law enforcement agencies received targeted training on financial intelligence, parallel investigation and the implementation of UN sanctions under Resolution 127, 167 and 1373. Additionally, in partnership with UNODC, Tanzania has enhanced its capacity to combat the threat of fallen terrorist fighters. Madam Chair, international terrorism remains a grave and organized global crime that requires unified, sustained and coordinated international efforts. Tanzania, recognizing this shared responsibility, continues to play a proactive role in combating and preventing international terrorism at the national, regional and international levels. At the regional level, Tanzania remains committed to the implementation of both AU and SADC counterterrorism strategy. Dueling the reporting period, we collaborated with neighboring states on a joint benchmarking exercise on the prevention of violent extremism Enhancing the exchange of intelligence and strategy to counter transnational threats. As the host to the SADC Regional Counterterrorism center in Dall es Salaam, we encourage regional and international organizations sport working partnership with this important center. Strengthening Jones efforts to detect, prevent and counterterrorism across borders. Madam Chair, Tanzania affirms its strong support to the United nations central role in conducting global counterterrorism efforts and commands the United Nations Office of On Counterterrorism for its continued support to Member states.
[Speaker A] [4197.180s → 4197.500s]: As.
[Speaker D] [4197.500s → 4324.890s]: A third party to nine international and one regional counterterrorism instrument. Tanzania welcomed the August 2024 follow up visit by the Counterterrorism Committee Executive Directorate which acknowledged our progress in aligning in aligned administrative legal police with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, particularly in addressing terrorism financing and proliferation. We appreciate the recommendation and remain committed to their full implementation to foster peace, security and sustainable development at national, regional and global levels. Madam Chair, despite long standing support for the agenda and the drafty Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism, we remain concerned that consensus on this critical instrument has not been yet reached. Tanzania joins Anza delegation in welcoming that resumed informal concentrations, consultations and argues all partners, all parties to lead double efforts towards concluding these negotiations. The adoption of CCIT would mark a significant milestone in a global legal framework against terrorism and reinforce our collective resolve. In conclusion, Tanzania affirms its commitment to countertellism in all its forms. We will continue to transcend partnership, build capacity and share intelligence with national, regional and international stakeholders. We also remain ready to work constructive towards consensus on the Comprehensive Convention on Internationalism and support global efforts for peaceful and secure world. Thank you for your kind attention.
[Speaker A] [4329.530s → 4658.780s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Tanzania for his statement. And I now give the floor to the Permanent Representative of Chad. You have your floor. That you have the floor. Your Excellency. Madam Chair. At the outset I wish to extend to you and the members of the Bureau our heartfelt congratulations upon your election to head up the work of the Sixth Committee. We also thank the management for the successful delivery of our work. We thank the Secretary General on this agenda item for the report on this agenda item and the entities that contributed to its drafting. The information contained in this report unanimously illustrate the commitment of Member States and of international organizations to combat terrorism both nationally and internationally, and also firmly condemn this phenomenon. Madam Chair, Chad strongly condemns terrorism in all of its forms and manifestations. And we reaffirm that terrorism is one of the gravest threats to international peace and security. All acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable regardless of the motivations, where they happen, or who perpetrated them. Chad remains resolute and will spend no effort to contribute as far as we can to collective actions to fight against this scourge. My country has always been and will continue to be at the forefront of the fight against terrorism in the Sahel region and in the Lake Chad basin. Chad's contribution to efforts as part of the mixed multinational force has enabled us to significantly decrease the capacity of the Boko Haram terrorist group, even if they still remain a threat to peace and security in the region. In addition to the security and military provisions, Chad has also strengthened legal instruments both on a domestic level as well as on a regional and international level, and has also boosted border cooperation on a regional and sub regional level. We have adopted a Law for the Repression of terrorist acts in 2020, which is a fundamental framework for the prevention and repression of acts of terrorism, in particular the taking of hostages, the financing of terrorism, the laundering of the assets of terrorism, as well as the recruitment, incitation and apology of terrorism. In addition, Chad has joined around 10 regional and international counterterrorism instruments, including the International Convention for the Repression of the Financing of Terrorism and the International Convention Against Hostage Taking, among others. It's in this same vein, that of the strengthening of international legal instruments, that Chad reiterates its preparedness to contribute to the drafting of the International Convention Against Terrorism and within the framework of the Working Group established to this end. Madam Chair, the Secretary General's report mentioned above bears witness to the fact that the fight against terrorism can only be a joint fight and that requires enhanced cooperation and commitment. No country or organization alone can succeed in this fight. It is only by working together and the respect of the sovereignty of States and engaging in coordinated actions that we will deliver this. In this regard, the Global Counterterrorism Strategy remains an important framework to fight against this dangerous phenomenon internationally. Chad supports this process and remains committed to it. In this vein, it's important to strengthen the different pillars of this strategy in order to respond effectively to new terrorist threats in the era of new ICTs and artificial intelligence. In the same vein, Chad applauds the efforts made by the Counterterrorism Office as well as by the UN ODC to help countries overcome the challenges they face in order to eliminate international terrorism. Madam Chair, all of these efforts made on a national and international level will only be effective and successful if the root causes of terrorism are addressed in Africa and in the Saheld and the Lake Chad region due to climate change and the issues faced by the populations. The lack of socioeconomic perspectives for youth are fertile ground for violent extremism and for recruitment. By way of conclusion, it's important to underscore that measures geared towards eliminating international terrorism cannot be disassociated from measures to promote socioeconomic development because providing basic social services, including health, education and basic food and livelihoods of populations are an important tool to help us to fight against terrorism. Thank you very much. Thank you, your Excellency, says the chair. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative, the distinguished permanent representative of the Syrian Arab Republic. Your Excellency, Please go ahead. You have the floor.
[Speaker C] [4662.220s → 5060.800s]: Madam Chair, given that this is the first time that the Syrian Arab Republic has taken the floor under your esteemed chairmanship, we would like to congratulate you on your election to chair the sixth Committee. We would like to express our full confidence in your ability to successfully manage our work. Syria also expresses its full preparedness to collaborate with you and with all delegations towards the success of this committee's work. We would like to associate ourselves with the two statements delivered on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Non Aligned Movement. The Syrian Arab Republic would like to reaffirm its firm commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. We specifically mention the terrorist organization isis, which still represents a direct threat to peace and security at the regional and international levels. In this context, the Syrian government forces, in close cooperation, coordination rather with international partners, chief among which are US forces, has carried out a number of special operations against this terrorist organization, the last of which was a joint operation in Al Bab area in the Governorate of Aleppo. This operation targeted prominent field leaders among ISIS's ranks. Syria emphasizes that continued international cooperation in this field must be carried out on a basis of respect for the sovereignty of the Syrian Arab Republic and its territorial unity and integrity. Madam Chair, we would like to remind and recall that the grave violations carried out in the former regime's time, Al Assad's regime's time, and the impunity that came along with these violations were some of the factors that helped create a fertile environment for extremism and violence as citizens were deprived of justice, accountability and equal opportunities. The new Syrian government has realized that combating terrorism requires a comprehensive approach that is not exclusively security and military oriented, but rather extends to addressing structural causes that allowed such radicalization to grow in the first place. We are carrying this out by upholding the rule of law, achieving justice, and enhancing trust between the state and society. In addition to the difficult heritage we inherited from the former regime. This regime has also made Syria a state that exports drugs, and this has supported terrorist organizations in Syria and all over the world. Therefore, the new Syrian government has worked to put an end to that era as well. Madam Chair, we would like to emphasize that the steps taken recently to partially lift the unilateral measures enforced upon the Syrian people, such as certain sanctions, have contributed tangibly to the alleviation of the humanitarian suffering and improving living circumstances and creating a more stable environment more conducive for economic activity. This has reflected positively on national efforts aiming to staunch the flow of terrorism and limit the radicalization of marginalized communities. The Syrian government is hoping that such steps will be completed by lifting the remaining illegitimate measures. This would allow for the flow of investments and development assistance and would support the path of economic recovery and reconstruction and would contribute to building a stable and prosperous national economy that provides employment opportunities and enhances sustainable stability and peace. Enhancing economic development and productive investment is the best path towards establishing societal and human security and removing the structural causes that feed radicalization and crises. In a related context, Madam Chair, we would like to point out the increasing complications that security and humanitarian matters are witnessing with relation to Al Hol camp in the northeast region of our country, where thousands of women and children from the families of those involved in ISIS are living in situations that are inhumane, with no effective and sustainable solution on the horizon. We call the concerned States to engage positively and constructively with leadership from the Assyrian government to address this sensitive matter with its humanitarian and legal and political dimensions in line with the legal, in line with the national laws in effect in Syria, and with respect to its unity and sovereignty and territorial integrity. Madam Chair, eliminating terrorism requires a comprehensive vision that addresses its roots and not just its manifestations. And this must be through enabling affected States to reclaim sovereignty over their entire territories and by achieving development and building powerful institutions able to stand in the face of radical thought. In this context, the Syrian Arab Republic emphasizes its full readiness to coordinate efforts and exchange expertise with Member States and relevant UN institutions in the field of capacity building and developing legislative and institutional relevant frameworks to counter terrorism and violent extremism on a basis of equal partnership and mutual respect. And we continue to be committed to this approach and to constructive work with partners in the international community with respect to the international law and the UN Charter, without politicization or selectivity. Thank you, Madam Chair.
[Speaker A] [5066.390s → 5077.430s]: I thank the Permanent Representative for your statement and I now give the floor to the Permanent Representative, the Deputy PR Of Timor Lechte. You have the floor.
[Speaker D] [5078.950s → 5388.930s]: Thank you, Madam Chair, for giving me the floor. As this is the first time my delegation takes the floor, I would like to to congratulate you and the members of the Bureau on your election. You can count on Timor Leste's full support as you guide our work during this 80th session. Timor Leste aligns itself with a statement delivered by the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non Aligned Movement. Allow me to highlight the following points in my national capacity. Terrorism, in all its forms and manifestations, wherever, by whomever and for whatever purpose committed, constitutes a grave violations of international law and human rights. It is utterly unjustifiable. Equally, terrorism must never be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group. Linking terror to identity fuels mistrust and alienation, deepening the divisions that violent extremists seek to exploit. Terrorism transcends the battlefield. It targets the innocent to so fear and manipulate policy. It takes root not in inclusive, peaceful societies, but where poverty, exclusion and despair persist. When people lack access to education, health care and livelihoods. When they feel unheard or excluded, they become more vulnerable to radical narratives which increasingly circulate online and exploit emerging technologies. Our response Our response must therefore be comprehensive. Security measures alone cannot eradicate extremism. We must invest in inclusive development that creates opportunity, strengthens governance and builds social cohesion. Peace building and nation building must go hand in hand with policing and intelligence work to bridge divides between communities and the state and to rebuild trust where it has been eroded. A critical part of this approach is cutting off the financial lifelines of terrorism. Illicit financing, whether through money laundering, tax havens or organized crime, enables recruitment and attacks. Stronger financial oversight, regulation of informal exchanges and regional cooperation to track cross border transactions are essential. Madam Chair, International cooperation remains indispensable. Terrorist network exploit porous borders and legal loopholes. Only through shared intelligence harmonize legal frameworks and joint operations can we stay ahead of evolving threats. In this regard, our Council of Ministers approved Timor Leste's accession to the ASEAN Convention on Counterterrorism, along with related instruments on mutual legal assistance and extradition. This marks an important milestone in our integration into regional security frameworks. At home, Timor Leste continues to translate this commitment into action. We are modernizing our national police and strengthening the technical capacity of our scientific and criminal investigation. Police intelligence led operations in Weikwisu Ambeno have disrupted offshore scam networks and blocked illicit investments, demonstrating how combating organized crime supports counterterrorism. We also draw upon our peace building legacy shaped in partnership with the United nations to ensure that our security policies remain firmly rooted in civilian and human rights perspectives. Madam Chair, as we strengthen our collective response, we must remain vigilant that counterterrorism measures do not undermine the very values we seek to protect. Efforts to eliminate terrorism must fully respect international humanitarian and human rights law and must be nationally owned and community driven. When security, development and human rights advance together, we build society that reject terror not only in law, but in spirit. Timor Leste looks forward to the upcoming review of the United Nations Global Counterterrorism Strategy. We stand ready to work with all partners to make our region and our world more peaceful, resilient and just. I thank you.
[Speaker A] [5393.170s → 5770.720s]: Thank you, your Excellency, for your statement. I now give the floor to the Permanent representative of the Dominican Republic. Your Excellency, you have the floor. Madam Chair, at the outset, please allow me on behalf of my delegation to extend our congratulations to you upon your election to head up the work of this sixth committee during the 80th session. We wish you every success and we offer you our full support. My delegation aligns itself with the statement made by the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non Aligned Movement and we wish to make the following comments in our national capacity. The Dominican Republic most strongly condemns terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. No cause, ideology or circumstance can justify the commission of terrorist acts. Our approach remains a comprehensive one that is combating terrorism in an effective manner whilst also guaranteeing the full respect of international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights. We welcome the decision of the General assembly in its 79th session to recommend the establishments at this sixth committee of a working group in order to finalize the draft Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism and to engage in a review to consider the possibility of convening a high level conference under the auspices of the UN. We trust that during this 80th session will be able to deliver this into concrete results. International achievements made in counterterrorism are significant. Today we have 55 legal instruments, 19 of which are universal and they specifically address the different manifestations of terrorism, from the protection of civil aviation and maritime navigation to the criminalization of nuclear terrorism and the financing of terrorism. However, there is still a significant legal loophole. The absence of a comprehensive convention that establishes common definitions and obligations. Delivering this instrument will contribute to strengthening the coherence of the international legal regime and cooperation in the judicial and preventive domains. The Dominican Republic has been strengthening its legislative and institutional frameworks in terms of the prevention and repression of terrorism on a domestic level. Act 2, 6708 on terrorism has been adopted that criminalizes terrorist acts pursuant to international standards and establishes judicial and reciprocal assistance cooperation mechanisms. What's more, our country has a national security and defence strategy that includes the fight against terrorism and its financing as cross cutting priorities of our national security. Over recent years, additional reforms and measures have been implemented to strengthen border controls as well as financial supervision and the capacity of institutions to respond, including the creation of the National Data center for the inter institutional coordination of intelligence and updating money laundering prevention standards and against the financing of terrorism pursuant to the recommendations of the GAFILAT Group, that's the Latin American Financial Action Group. These actions reflect the commitment of our government to relevant resolutions of the Security Council, to the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy and to the obligations that stem from international treaties that our country is a party to. The phenomenon of terrorism is evolving and is intertwined with other transnational threats such as the illicit trafficking of arms, illicit financial flows, the misuse of digital technologies and the destabilization of border areas. That's why the Dominican Republic insists on the need to strengthen regional and international cooperation mechanisms, effective border control, the timely exchange of intelligence and reciprocal legal assistance, judicial assistance, including agile extradition mechanisms and mechanisms for the seizing of assets. Madam Chair, the Dominican Republic will continue to promote, alongside countries in the Caribbean and in our hemisphere, strategies, joint strategies to prevent transnational crimes leading to ecosystems of violence and terrorist threats. We also underscore the importance of prevention measures in the areas of education, social cohesion and community resilience, as well as the importance of including gender and human rights approach in policies to prevent and fight against violent extremism. Finally, we reaffirm that international cooperation in counterterrorism must be focused on legality, proportionality and accountability. The Dominican Republic supports the upcoming conclusion of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism and reiterates our commitment to contributing with a constructive spirit to the working group established by this Committee. Thank you very much, Madam Chair. The Chair thanks the distinguished permanent representative of the Dominican Republic and gives the floor to the observer delegation of the International Committee of the Red Cross. You have the floor.
[Speaker E] [5774.000s → 5774.440s]: Thank you.
[Speaker A] [5774.440s → 5794.630s]: Madam Chair, please allow me to congratulate you and the rest of the Bureau on your election. Chair. The International Committee of the Red Cross unequivocally condemns all acts of terrorism, whether in times of armed conflict or not, and regardless of the perpetrators. Terrorism is prohibited under international humanitarian law.
[Speaker E] [5795.190s → 5797.870s]: Acts or threats of violence whose primary.
[Speaker A] [5797.870s → 5801.750s]: Purpose is to spread terror among civilians are prohibited.
[Speaker E] [5802.550s → 5805.190s]: These prohibitions apply equally to all parties.
[Speaker A] [5805.190s → 5807.890s]: To armed conflict state and non state alike.
[Speaker E] [5809.000s → 5823.800s]: Terrorism violates IHL and negates the basic principle of humanity. The ICRC has repeatedly recalled the prohibition on terrorizing the civilian population, both in public statements and in its confidential bilateral.
[Speaker A] [5823.800s → 5826.040s]: Dialogue with Parties to armed conflict.
[Speaker E] [5827.240s → 5833.640s]: Chair the ICRC recognizes the legitimacy for States to take responsive action in conformity.
[Speaker A] [5833.640s → 5837.810s]: With international humanitarian law to counterterrorism and.
[Speaker E] [5837.810s → 5840.690s]: Ensure their security and that of their population.
[Speaker A] [5841.970s → 5849.010s]: However, we continue to observe instances where counterterrorism measures may restrict humanitarian action.
[Speaker E] [5849.810s → 5857.290s]: The risk exists when humanitarian activities conducted by impartial humanitarian organizations such as the.
[Speaker A] [5857.290s → 5861.440s]: ICRC are considered as a form of support to terrorism.
[Speaker E] [5862.550s → 5864.950s]: This may result in the criminalization of.
[Speaker A] [5864.950s → 5870.710s]: Humanitarian activities which are foreseen, authorized and protected under ihl.
[Speaker E] [5871.830s → 5885.790s]: Impartial humanitarian organizations must be able to carry out such activities which include, for example, the delivery of food assistance to civilians, the delivery of essential services such.
[Speaker A] [5885.790s → 5888.390s]: As water or electricity to the civilian.
[Speaker E] [5888.390s → 5899.660s]: Population, providing medical supplies and treatment for the wounded and sick, visiting people deprived of their liberty, reuniting families and training.
[Speaker A] [5899.660s → 5903.460s]: Parties to armed conflict on their obligations under ihl.
[Speaker E] [5904.979s → 5911.860s]: Criminalization of such activities is also in clear contradiction with States obligation under IHL.
[Speaker A] [5911.860s → 5925.840s]: To respect and protect humanitarian personnel. As recalled in UN Security Council Resolution 2730, the Security Council and the General assembly have both urged States to ensure.
[Speaker E] [5926.160s → 5936.400s]: That their counterterrorism frameworks do not impede humanitarian and medical activities or engagement with relevant actors as foreseen by ihl.
[Speaker A] [5937.360s → 5942.620s]: They have also demanded that States ensure that all measures taken to counterterrorism comply.
[Speaker E] [5942.620s → 5980.750s]: With their obligations under international law, including ihl. In the view of the icrc, the most effective way to reconcile counterterrorism obligations with IHL and preserve humanitarian activities is to adopt well framed and standing humanitarian exemptions. To this end, in July 2025 the ICRC published an Advisory Note on Humanitarian Exemptions in Domestic Counterterrorism Legislation. The document sets out the relevant rules of ihl, including the rules governing humanitarian.
[Speaker A] [5980.750s → 5990.390s]: Activities, the rules protecting humanitarian personnel, and the rules protecting the wounded and sick as well as those providing medical assistance.
[Speaker E] [5991.270s → 5994.310s]: It proposes sample wording of a humanitarian.
[Speaker A] [5994.310s → 6018.630s]: Exemption that strikes the right balance between of avoiding the adverse impact of counterterrorism legislation on humanitarian action without opening the exemption up to abuse or otherwise endangering the effectiveness of counterterrorism measures. A limited number of Member States have already adopted such measures, but more efforts have still to be made.
[Speaker E] [6019.510s → 6032.460s]: We commend the Member States that have already taken steps in this direction and we encourage others to follow suit. Chair the ICRC looks forward to continued discussions with States and with UN bodies.
[Speaker A] [6032.620s → 6040.780s]: In order to raise awareness about the impact of counterterrorism measures and promote effective mitigation of their unintended consequences.
[Speaker E] [6041.020s → 6041.740s]: Thank you, Chair.
[Speaker A] [6047.340s → 6127.280s]: I thank the distinguished representative of the observer delegation of the icrc. Distinguished delegates. The distinguished representative of the observer delegation of the ICRC was the last speaker on the list for this agenda item. This concludes our debate On Agenda Item 109, Measures to Fight international terrorism. We recall that the Working Group established under the present agenda item will meet on 17th of October and 6th of November, 2025. I understand that the delegation of the Observer State of Palestine wishes to exercise its right of reply. Before I proceed in this regard, I wish to remind the Committee that pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Annex 5 of the Rules of Procedure of the General assembly, the number of interventions in exercise of right of reply by any delegation in any given meeting must be limited to two per agenda item. The duration of the first intervention in exercise of right to reply must be limited to 10 minutes and the second intervention must be limited to 5 minutes in exercise of right of reply. I give the floor to the distinguished delegates of the observer State of Palestine.
[Speaker B] [6131.290s → 6250.200s]: Thank you, Madam Chair. I am exercising our right of reply in response to the statement made by the Israeli delegate celebrating their criminality and terrorism against the Palestinian people and peoples of our region. As achievements, humanity has evolved considerably in its understanding of how wars are fought. It has also evolved in its codification of treaties to protect civilians, children, women, men, prisoners of war, medical workers and aid workers. Humanity elaborated an entire system of law and principles after the horrors of World War II, with the charter of the United nations at its cornerstone, affirming that might does not make right and that the threat or use of force is prohibited against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. And that genocide is prohibited and that torture is prohibited, and that the protection follows the civilian, not the civilian follows the protection, and that aggression and acts of aggressions are outlawed. This is a civilization that we collectively chose for the sake of all and not for one against the other. But Israel not just chooses barbarity and violence, it celebrates it and glorifies it in this room. And Israel believes that trying to win a war and claim total victory grants them the right to commit aggression, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, the worst crimes imaginable and call it the so called eradicating terrorism, when in fact it is eradicating a people under its illegal occupation and apartheid regime and eradicating the rule of law. Israel clearly believes that the barbarity and crimes of the Dark Ages are not just relevant to it, but are models to be emulated into this age. A complete abdication of legality, humanity and morality that underpinned the UN Charter. Unlike what Israel claims, the threat to our regional security and peace, and to international peace and security is Israel's illegal occupation, apartheid regime and genocide that must.
[Speaker G] [6250.200s → 6253.200s]: End its crimes for 77 years threaten.
[Speaker B] [6253.200s → 6283.340s]: Not just our collective security, but humanity itself. Israeli delegate thinks that if they weaponize the word terrorism, they would divert and distract from the fact that there is a Palestinian people with a just cause, struggling for over seven decades for the attainment of their unalienable rights, for the same freedoms and dignity cherished by your countries and to which all peoples of the world are entitled to, and to which we will never relent in seeking until they are realized in accordance with international law and UN resolution. Thank you.
[Speaker A] [6292.540s → 6343.300s]: I thank the distinguished delegates of the observer delegation of Palestine. Since there are no further speakers on our list, I wish to inform you that Ms. Beatrice Maillet of Canada will coordinate the draft resolution on agenda item 109 as agreed at our first meeting. We will provide the coordinators assigned to each agenda item the opportunity to take the floor to give a brief indication of their plans, and if possible, to already introduce the initial draft of their proposals for draft resolutions where applicable. As such, could I please ask Ms. Maillet to take the floor on this agenda item? Madam, you have the floor.
[Speaker B] [6346.580s → 6348.180s]: Merci voucoup, Madame la President.
[Speaker A] [6348.820s → 6385.820s]: Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Since it's the first time that my delegation is taking the floor in this debate, at this committee at the outset, please allow me to congratulate you and the whole bureau upon your appointment and congratulations on your great work thus far. In the same vein as my colleague from Gabon, I also wish to thank the whole of the Secretariat team who are helping us to navigate the next few weeks, but also our interpreters who are facilitating our work, says the speaker very kindly.
[Speaker E] [6387.740s → 6388.660s]: Our colleagues.
[Speaker B] [6388.660s → 6394.140s]: I followed with great interest the debate and the statements delivered by delegations.
[Speaker E] [6394.620s → 6399.180s]: I'm comforted by the international community full.
[Speaker B] [6399.260s → 6431.360s]: Condemnation of terrorism and violent extremism in all forms and manifestation. As coordinator for the draft resolution on measures to eliminate international terrorism, I have the honor today to speak about the zero draft resolution on this item. Over the next week or two, I will have bilateral exchanges with delegations. So please do not hesitate to reach.
[Speaker C] [6431.360s → 6433.160s]: Out to me and to engage.
[Speaker B] [6434.040s → 6469.180s]: I will only circulate a zero draft text which will contain maybe a technical Update and invite delegations to submit their comments and proposal, if any, after these initial bilateral consultations. Madam Chair, allow me to thank most sincerely the delegations in advance for their cooperation and support on this item and again the Bureau for entrusting me with this particular task. Thank you.
[Speaker A] [6475.260s → 6564.650s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Canada for the information provided. I encourage the Coordinator to use the Esponsorship model, the Esponsorship module rather, in the Edelegate portal for the circulation of the draft resolution as early as possible and to submit it for processing in good time. Distinguished Delegates, we shall now turn to agenda item 137. Programme planning. This item has been allocated to all committees on an annual basis since the 61st session of the General Assembly. There are no speakers inscribed on the list of speakers. Would any delegation like to take the floor? If you would like to, you may take the floor now. I see none. We have thus concluded our consideration of Agenda Item 137. Programme Planning. Distinguished Delegates Program of Work the Seas.
[Speaker C] [6564.650s → 6573.360s]: Committee will now commence its consideration of Agenda Item 84. The Rule of Law at the national and international levels.
[Speaker D] [6573.600s → 6576.880s]: I draw your attention to the 2025.
[Speaker C] [6576.880s → 6582.360s]: Report of the Secretary General on strengthening and coordinating United Nations Rule of law.
[Speaker D] [6582.360s → 6591.080s]: Activities contained in document A99. This report is available on the website.
[Speaker C] [6591.080s → 6592.000s]: Of the Seas Committee.
[Speaker D] [6593.440s → 6595.760s]: Before opening the floor for the debate.
[Speaker C] [6595.760s → 6605.110s]: On the agenda item, I wish to inform that we will receive a presentation From Deputy General Mrs. Amina Muhammad who.
[Speaker D] [6605.110s → 6607.150s]: Will speak on this year report on.
[Speaker C] [6607.150s → 6611.030s]: Behalf of the Secretary General at our meeting this afternoon at 3pm.
[Speaker D] [6613.669s → 6615.190s]: Distinguidos delegados.
[Speaker C] [6615.990s → 6619.830s]: Let us distinguished the debate on the agenda item.
[Speaker D] [6622.950s → 6628.290s]: The first speaker on the list is the distinguished representative of Iran on behalf.
[Speaker C] [6628.290s → 6631.250s]: Of the Non Alignment Movement. You have the floor, sir.
[Speaker F] [6635.330s → 7633.300s]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Madam Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the Non Aligned Movement. The Non Aligned Movement has diligently followed this item and believes that the respect for the rule of law at the national and international levels is essential to maintaining international peace and security as well as achieving socioeconomic development. The Non Alive Movement reiterates its position that it is indispensable in maintaining balance in the development of the national and international dimensions of the rule of law. We continue to believe that from the international scope the rule of law requires more meticulous attention by the organization. The Charter of the United nations and the principles enshrined therein provide normative guidance as to the basis of the rule of law at the international levels. In this context, the Non Aligned Movement believes that the following elements are essential in fostering international relations based on the rule of law the principle of sovereign equality of States, inter alia, entails that all States have equal opportunity to participate in law making processes at the international levels. All States should equally respect and comply with their obligations under treaty as well as customary international law. Also, selective application of international law must be avoided. The legitimate and legal rights of States under international law must be respected by all and the principle of the prohibition of the threat or use of force in the international relations of States and peaceful settlement of disputes should constitute the cornerstone of the rule of law at the international level. In this regard, it is essential that Member States remain committed to a rule based regime in the conduct of their respective relations with other Member States. Madam Chair the Movement emphasizes that the principles and rules of international law are indispensable in preserving and strengthening the rule of law at the international level. Therefore, the Member States of the United nations should renew their pledge to uphold, preserve and promote the purposes of and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United nations and international law, with the purpose of further advancing towards the achievement of full respect of international law. The Movement recognizes the serious danger and threats posed by the actions and measures which seek to undermine international law and international legal instruments. In this regard, the Movement strongly encourages Member States to identify and pursue measures that may contribute towards achieving a peaceful and prosperous world as well as a just and equitable world order based on the UN Charter and international law. The Movement also encourages States to resort to pacific settlement of disputes through mechanisms and tools established under international law. We also call upon the General assembly and the Security Council to utilize the right conferred to them under Article 96 of the Charter of the United nations to request advisory opinions on any legal question from the International Court of Justice whenever appropriate. We extend our appreciation to the Secretary General for his report contained in document A80 99 entitled Strengthening and Coordinating United Nations Rule of Law Activities. The NAM Members also reiterate that human rights, the rule of law and democracy are interdependent and mutually reinforcing. All States should fulfill their obligations to promote the universal respect for an observance and protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. In accordance with the Charter of the United nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other instruments relating to human rights and International law. While underlining the importance of freedom of opinion and expression under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Movement emphasizes that in exercising such freedom, morality, public order and the rights and freedoms of others must be recognized and respected as apparent under Article 29 of the Declaration. As freedom of expression is not absolute, its exercise should be carried with responsibilities in accordance with the relevant international human rights law and instruments. The NAM members remain concerned with the application of unilateral measures and stress upon their negative impact on the rule of law under rule of international law as well as on international relations. No State or group of States have the authority to deprive other States of their legal rights for political considerations. The implementation of generally recognized principles of international law and the fulfillment in good faith of international obligations should guide international action of States in this regard. The NAM reiterates that the States should refrain from practice of selectivity in international relations and impose their will on other States, including through unilateral coercive measures in violation of international law. The non Aligned Movement underlines that close cooperation and coordination among all principal organs of the United nations is highly indispensable in order to enable the Organization to remain relevant and capable of meeting existing new and emerging threats as well as challenges. Nonetheless, the Movement reiterates its concerns its concern over the continuing encroachment by the Security Council on the functions and powers of the General assembly and the Economic and Social Council by taking up issues which fall within the competence of the latter organs. The use of veto power by the Security Council is the main factor that encroaches on the competence of principal organs of the United Nations. Therefore, the use of veto should be curtailed with a view to its eventual elimination. The Security Council should fully comply with international law and the United Nations Charter. Madam Chair the General assembly must play a leading role in promoting and coordinating efforts towards strengthening the rule of law. However, the international community must avoid replacing national authorities with the task of establishing or strengthening the rule of law at the national level and instead should only provide them with necessary support at their request. The Movement recognizes the importance of national ownership in rule of law activities and underlines the importance of strengthening the national capacities of Member States in the domestic implementation of their respective international obligations, including through enhanced technical assistance and capacity building. The Movement reiterates the need for those activities to be undertaken at the request of interested recipient Governments strictly within the respective mandates of the United nations funds and programs. It is also necessary to take into account the customs as well as the national political and socio economic realities to prevent imposition of pre established models upon Member States that would hinder the resolution of existing problems in each country. The Movement underlines that the rule of law at the national and international levels is essential for the promotion of peace, justice and strong institutions in line with Goal 16 of the Sustainable Development Goals. SDG 16 the movement views SDG 16 as promoting the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensuring equal access to justice for all. In this regard, the Movement reaffirms its commitment to strengthening the rule of law to achieve these objectives. Regarding the Rule of Law Unit, the Movement reiterates that appropriate mechanisms should be established for Member States to stay abreast of the Unit's work, as well as to ensure regular interaction between the latter and the General Assembly. In this regard, we would like to emphasize that there is no single agreed upon definition of the rule of law. These facts should be taken into account in the preparation of reports which should be objective, neutral and balanced and at the time of collecting, classifying and evaluating the quality of data on issues which are directly or indirectly related to the rule of law. The data gathering activities of UN bodies must not lead to a unilateral formulation of rule of law indicators and ranking of countries in any manner. Those indicators of rule of law which have not been agreed upon by Member States in an open and transparent discussion and consultation are not acceptable. Madam Chair the Non alive movement condemns any attempt to destabilize democratic and constitutional order in any non Member States. The non alive movement condemns Israel's continuing military occupation of the Palestinian Territory in breach of international law and UN resolutions. The non ally movement condemns the continuing brutal Israeli military campaign against the defenseless Palestinian people, particularly in the Gaza Strip, by which the Occupying Power has continued to commit grave human rights violations and reported war crimes and crimes against humanity, including by use of excessive indiscriminate force that over the years has killed and injured thousands of Palestinian civilians, including children, inter alia, as a result of extrajudicial executions as reported inter alia by the Independent Commission of Inquiry of the Human Rights Council and the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967. The Non Alive Movement deplores the killing of over 60,000 of of 60,000 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip period between October 2023 and July 2025, over 70% of whom were children and women, and the wounding and maiming of over 143,000 Palestinian children, women and men in bombardments by air, land, sea and sea by the Israeli occupying forces, as well as ongoing attacks by occupying forces and settlers in the west bank, including East Jerusalem that killed over 1,000 Palestinians, including at least 200 children, and wounded more than 7,000 people in the same period, the Non Aligned Movement condemns Israel's inhuman siege in Gaza which constitutes mass collective punishment of the population and which continues to impede humanitarian access and the entry of food, water, medicine, fuel and other essential supplies, thereby resulting in devastating living and socioeconomic conditions. The Non Alive Movement expresses grave concern about famine and the catastrophic humanitarian crisis, including widespread hunger and malnutrition and rampant spread of illness and disease, gravely impacting the most vulnerable in the population, especially children, elderly persons and sick and wounded persons caused by the Israeli siege. In addition to the immense loss of life and injury suffered by the Palestinian civilian population as a result of the Israeli aggression, the Non Aligned Movement demanded that the complete lifting of this illegal blockade, a halt to the use of starvation as a weapon of war and a scrupulous respect by Israel as the occupying Power of its obligation under international law, including humanitarian and human rights law and the relevant resolutions. The Non Aligned Movement expresses its deep regret that June 2025 marked the passage of 58 years since the onset of Israel's foreign occupation on Palestinian and other Arab lands in 1967 and reflected on other solemn anniversaries including the 77th anniversary of the 1948 and Nakba that befell the Palestinian people and which continues to this day and called for the exertion and intensification of all necessary efforts to bring an end to this injustice and advance a peaceful and just solution. The non Ally Movement also expresses its deep regret that the Palestinian people have continuously suffered under the brutal Israeli military occupation of their land and continue to be denied their fundamental human rights including the right to self determination. The NAM reiterates its position welcoming the General Assembly's adoption of Resolution 6719 on 29th November 2012 which inter alia accorded Palestine with the status of non member observer state in the United nations, reflecting international community's long standing principled support for the ineligible rights of the Palestinian people including self determination, independence and for the two state solution based on the pre1967 borders in accordance with international law including relevant United nations resolutions. The Movement reaffirms the significance of this political and legal achievement for the Palestinian people and the Government of the State of Palestine, while also reaffirming its support for the State of Palestine in order to ensure its rightful place in the community of nations, including the achievement of its admission to membership in the United nations in fulfillment of the application for full membership submitted by President Mahmoud Abbas on 23rd September 2011 which remains pending before the Security Council in this connection, the Non Aligned Movement strongly welcomes the important step taken, including by several members of the Movement in extending official recognition to the State of Palestine on the basis of the 1967 borders, the recognition extended by several European countries in 2024 and the continuing calls for recognition by numerous European Parliaments. The Non Alive Movement considers that such recognition constitutes a significant contribution to sustaining momentum towards the ultimate realization of independence. The Non Alive Movement deplores the ongoing Israeli intransigence and illegal policies of the Occupying Power that greatly undermine the realization of a just, lasting and comprehensive peaceful solution to the Israeli Palestinian conflict, including ongoing attempts to destroy and thwart the Two State Solution. The Non Aligned Movement welcomes the call by the General assembly in its Resolution ES of 18 September 2024 entitled Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice and the legal consequences arising from Israel's policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory including East Jerusalem and from the illegality of Israel's continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory for the convening of an international conference under the auspices of the assembly and co chaired by France and Saudi Arabia for the implementation of the United nations resolutions pertaining to the question of Palestine and the Two State Solution for the achievement of a just last and comprehensive peace in the Middle East. The Non Aligned Movement also stresses the importance of efforts undertaken in the context of international conference for the implementation of the resolutions pertaining to the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine at the Two State Solution as well as the efforts of the Global alliance for the Two State Solution. The Non Aligned Movement urges that due priority should continue to be given.
[Speaker A] [7635.940s → 7636.220s]: The.
[Speaker F] [7636.220s → 7954.800s]: Non Aligned Movement urges that due priority should continue to be given to promoting knowledge of respect for and observance of State Parties obligations assumed under international human rights humanitarian law instruments, in particular Those of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their 1977 protocols and encourage the States that have not yet done so to consider ratifying or acceding to the two 1977 additional protocols in this regard, while taking into account the magnitude and persistence of the violations and breaches of international law, including international humanitarian law being committed by Israel, the Occupying Power in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Non Alive Movement welcomes the most recent Declaration adopted by the High contracting parties on 17th December 2014 which inter alia called once again on Israel, the Occupying Power to fully and effectively respect the Fourth Geneva Convention in the Occupied Palestinian Territory including East Jerusalem and which emphasized that all serious violations of international humanitarian law must be investigated and that all those responsible should be brought to justice. The Non Aligned Movement reiterates their demand that Israel, the occupying Power, immediately cease all such violations of international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, and fully abide by its obligations, including under the Fourth Geneva Convention. The members of the Non Ally Movement that are party to the Rome Statute also affirmed the importance of the International Criminal Court ICC for addressing reported war crimes and crimes against humanity being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people and emphasized the centrality of justice in bringing an end to such crimes and impunity. The Non Aligned Movement echoes the call by the UN Special Procedures mandate holders of 16 November 2023 of the obligation by the international community to prevent the risk of genocide in Gaza Strip and take all measures to put an end to that, including by ensuring the immediate implementation of the ICJ provision on measures orders of 26 January 2024, 28 March 2024 and 24 May 2024. Non Member States once again reiterate their call for the continued provision of the needed humanitarian and socioeconomic assistance to the Palestinian people, including the Palestine refugees. The movement reaffirms the continued indispensability of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the near east, unrwa, along with other United nations agencies and international organizations in alleviating their plight, and urges the international community to support the agency with sufficient and predictable funding without blocking its humanitarian work. NAM rejects any attempt by Israel to sideline UNRWA as this poses a threat to its humanitarian role. In accordance with its General assembly mandate, the NAM reiterates its call for collective international efforts to uphold international law to bring an end to to the historic and grave injustice against the Palestinian people. The Non Ally Movement calls upon all parties to international armed conflict to redouble their efforts to comply with their obligations under international humanitarian law, including the principles of precautions against the effects of attacks, proportionality and distinction by, inter alia, prohibiting the targeting of civilian populations, civilian objects and certain special property during an armed conflict and obliging parties to any conflict to ensure general protection against dangers arising from military operations for civilians, for civilian installations, hospitals, means of transportation and relief materials, and distribution of such relief materials. The Non Alive Movement reiterates the movement's condemnation of the increasing attacks on the safety and security of humanitarian personnel and urged the Government of UN Member States to ensure respect for the protection of the personnel of humanitarian organizations in conformity with the relevant international law. Humanitarian agencies and their personnel must respect the international humanitarian law and the laws of the Countries where the countries they work in and the guiding principles of humanitarian assistance set forth in the General Assembly Resolution 46182 and its Annex and non interference as well as cultural, religious and other values of the population in the countries where they operate. Finally, Madam Chair, we encourage Member States to continue their efforts to construct an agreeable subtopic for the debate in the next session, as well as the report of the Secretary General. Madam Chair, this is the statement on behalf of the Non Alive movement in our national capacity. We will deliver another statement at a later stage. Thank you.
[Speaker A] [7958.160s → 7987.290s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Iran for his statement and before I give the floor to the next Speaker, I would like to remind delegations that the speaking time for group statements is 12 minutes. We'd like to ask for your kind cooperation with this. Thank you. I give the floor now to the distinguished representative of Cameroon. You have the floor.
[Speaker H] [7989.690s → 8561.100s]: Madam Chair, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the African Group. Madam Chair, the African Group reaffirmed its commitment to the rule of law at the national international level, and it is pleased that this item is once again included on our agenda. The Group thanks the Secretary General for its report containing document A80 99, which provide information on effort to promote and strengthen the rule of law at the national and international level, as well as on the coordination of United nations rule of law assistance. Madam Chair, As a United Nations Marxist 80th anniversary, the African Group underscored that the rule of law at both national and international level remains fundamental to maintaining peace and security, promoting justice, equality and development, and upholding human rights. However, many developing countries continue to face barriers to meaningful participation, including limited resources, insufficient technical expertise and structural inequities. These challenges perpetuate power imbalance and hinder the international legal order from being truly representative and just. The African Group emphasized that addressing this obstacle must remain a priority to ensure an inclusive, equitable and effective rule of law. As we celebrate 8th decade of the United nations, our experience demonstrates that strengthening legal institutions, upholding accountability and ensuring equal access to justice are essential for sustainable development. The same principle must guide our approach at the international level, where inclusivity, equity and transparency are vital for a just international legal order. In this context, all states, regardless of size, military capability or economic status, must have an equal voice in shaping the norm and role that govern the global community. Through such inclusive participation, we can create an international legal order that reflects the shared value and aspiration of all nations. Building between leaders, institutions and the people is central to reimagining the social contract and ensuring legitimacy at all level. Responsive and accountable institutions are key to building such trust. Yet mistrust, whether within society or among states, undermines the rule of law and weakens international cooperation. Rebuilding confidence must therefore remain a shared priority to achieve a just, inclusive and effective global order. Madam Chair, the African Group reaffirms the principle of sovereign equality in this regard. The Group remains deeply concerned by incidents of foreign interference in the affair of developing countries by certain states, including in judicial institutions. Such action undermined amongst other the independence of national courts and tribunals as well as democratic value, erode confidence between state and jeopardized the very principle of the rule of law they claim to uphold. The Group strongly condemned these practices and stressed the need for it to be decisively addressed. The attitude of acting as self appoint overseers over the judicial processes of sovereign state runs counter the ideals of the rule of law and must be rejected. In the same way, extensive interpretation of international law that could justify external intervention under the pretext of defending the rule of law are practices to be prohibited in contemporary international relations. The African Group believe that respect for international law is founded on the conviction that international conduct must be good governed not by individual interest of state or their allies, but instead through a set of universally applicable rules and principles that all states have a responsibility to uphold. Madam Chair, today multilateralism is in deep crisis. When the United nations was created and its charter adopted, the world envisioned a system based on peace, security, development and respect for human rights principle that will form the foundation of a true community of state. Yet recent global events remind us that war, violence and a blatant disregard for international law are harsh reality that we must confront with renewed determination. Indifference to human suffering is alarming, the plight of migrants remain a grave concern and terrorism continues to ravage inter region with total contempt for human life and rights. We are concerned of the repeated assault of multilateralism, true resurgence, unilateralism, extremism, double standard interference in the affair of other states, weaponization of certain institution or organization and selective sensitivity in case of international conflicts. We are also deeply concerned at the ongoing weakening of the effectiveness of multilateral organization and treaty regime, obstruction of reform, flagrant violation of international law, a disturbing disregard for human rights in ongoing conflict compelled us to question the very essence, purpose and relevance of our collective effort to build peaceful, just and inclusive society grounded in the rule of law. Madam Chair, the African Group offered the following key recommendation to promote the rule of law at the national and international level strengthen capacity building and technical assistance. The African Group urged the international community to invest in capacity building initiative and provide technical assistance to developing countries. This will enable all States to engage fully and effectively in international legal processes, including fish negotiation, dispute resolution and participation in international court and tribunals. Strengthening the legal ability of all Member States is essential to level the playing field and foster a more inclusive and effective international order. Promote equitable access to international dispute settlement mechanism and representation in international institutions. Particular attention should be paid to the concern regarding the cost and complexity of the mechanism and procedure of international dispute settlement mechanism for states with limited resources. Also, efforts should be made to ensure that international legal institutions, including courts and tribunals as well as other bodies, reflect the diversity of the global community. Ensure fair and consistent application of international law the international legal order must operate consistently. Selective application or inconsistent enforcement of international law undermines trust, erode the rule of law and diminish accountability. State must commit to apply international legal standards fairly and consistently, irrespective of political, economic or strategic interest. Promote inclusivity at the national level to support international law Rule of law effort national institution governance structure and legal framework should be strengthened to uphold justice, accountability and human rights. Inclusive and transparent legal system at the national level Reinforce broader effort to strengthen the rule of law and contribute to the development of states. Upholding the Rule of law at the International level the African Group emphasized that a stable, predictable and just international system depends on adherence to the rule of law. All States must respect cardinal rule of law, including the principle of sovereign equality, territorial integrity and political independence. Strengthening the rule of law Ensure collective security promote peaceful dispute resolution and foster cooperation in addressing global challenges, including conflict prevention, climate change and national threats. Reaffirm the central role of multilateralism as a driver for the rule of law at the international level. We call for multilateral terrorism that promotes the international rule of law to protect a fair and just international legal system. Uphold the authority and unity of the international law offer more institutional public goods to all countries through cooperation and mutual understanding and improve the institutionalization of a global community with a shared future for humanity by enhancing global governance and ensuring that no one and no country is left behind. I thank you for your attention.
[Speaker A] [8566.950s → 8584.950s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Cameroon speaking on behalf of the African Group. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Austria, speaking on behalf of the Group of Friends with the rule of law. Austria, you have the floor. Thank you, Madam Chair.
[Speaker F] [8585.190s → 8587.270s]: It's an honor to deliver this statement.
[Speaker E] [8587.510s → 8590.540s]: On behalf of over 50 members from.
[Speaker F] [8590.540s → 8592.540s]: All regional groups of the Group of.
[Speaker E] [8592.540s → 8640.160s]: Friends of the Rule of Law. The Group of Friends would like to thank the Secretary General for his latest report on strengthening and coordinating United nations rule of law activities contained in A80 99. We are also grateful to the Secretary General for continuously placing a high priority on the rule of law as a matter of system wide policy coordination, in particular in these challenging times. Madam chair, at the 80th anniversary of the United nations, it is timely to reflect on the state of the rule of law at the national and international level. The rule of law is not an abstract legal concept. It is the very foundation the UN was built on 80 years ago.
[Speaker F] [8641.120s → 8643.480s]: To quote the Secretary General, the rule.
[Speaker E] [8643.480s → 8654.590s]: Of law is the bedrock of multilateral and the foundation for just and peaceful societies. The Group of Friends could not agree more. The rule of law is a cornerstone.
[Speaker F] [8654.590s → 8657.990s]: For lasting peace, security, the realization of.
[Speaker E] [8657.990s → 8661.510s]: Human rights, economic development and social progress.
[Speaker F] [8662.310s → 8664.830s]: It is also a core objective for.
[Speaker E] [8664.830s → 8671.750s]: The full implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as enshrined in SDG.
[Speaker F] [8674.280s → 8676.280s]: The rule of law ensures that no.
[Speaker A] [8676.280s → 8678.360s]: One is above the law.
[Speaker F] [8679.320s → 8681.080s]: At the national level, it is the.
[Speaker E] [8681.080s → 8704.210s]: Foundation of just and peaceful societies. At the international level, our community of States represented in this room made a choice 80 years ago. The rule of law, instead of might, makes right. The rule of law fosters multilateralism and justice. Eroding the rule of law would risk.
[Speaker F] [8704.290s → 8707.010s]: An erosion of multilateralism itself.
[Speaker E] [8708.930s → 8756.020s]: At its 80th anniversary, the challenges to the rule of law on the national and international level are real and present at the same time. The latest report by the Secretary General contains an impressive snapshot of the indispensable work of the United nations in promoting and strengthening the rule of law both nationally and internationally. Furthermore, the report underscores major achievements in the codification and development of international instruments, norms, standards and rules, as well as the high level of judicial activity of international and hybrid courts and tribunals. Reflecting the UN's unwavering commitment to legal.
[Speaker F] [8756.020s → 8760.660s]: Accountability, international justice and an international order.
[Speaker E] [8761.380s → 8762.820s]: Based on the rule of law.
[Speaker F] [8764.580s → 8764.860s]: The.
[Speaker E] [8764.860s → 8807.700s]: Group of Friends strongly supports the International Court of Justice as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. Decisions of the ICJ are binding on the parties to a case and must be complied with. We also recall the ICJ's contributions on legal questions through advisory opinions. The Group of Friends also strongly supports the indispensable work of the UN human rights treaty bodies. As independent guardians of the core human rights treaties. The rule of law and human rights are mutually reinforced. Madam chair, at its 80th anniversary, let.
[Speaker A] [8807.700s → 8810.300s]: Us uphold the UN Charter and ensure.
[Speaker E] [8810.700s → 8825.260s]: That the rule of law is a universal and fundamental principle. The Group of Friends will continue to give utmost priority to this subject and stress the importance of the rule of law and its principles. I thank you.
[Speaker B] [8832.710s → 8841.990s]: I thank the distinguished representative of Austria. I now give the floor to the European Union on behalf of the EU and its members. You have the floor.
[Speaker E] [8842.950s → 9460.060s]: Gracias, Senora Presidenta. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries, North Macedonia, Montenegro, the Republic of Moldova, both Leonard Zegovina and Georgia, as well as Monaco and San Marino, align themselves with this statement. We thank the Secretary General for his comprehensive report on strengthening and coordinating United nations rule of law activities. Once again, the report provides a wealth of examples, best practices and inspiration for our debate. The 80th anniversary of the United nations offers the opportunity to reflect on the state of the rule of law, both national and international levels, to take stock of what has been achieved and what still remains to be accomplished. Indeed, this anniversary finds us at the moment when the international legal order suffers a level of strain which is unprecedented since the end of World War II and the creation of the United Nations. We are facing increasing and diverse threats to international peace and security. These include grave violations of the UN Charter, such as acts of aggression and violation of territorial integrity, as well as egregious breaches of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. We all have a duty to stand up for the UN Charter and the fundamental rules and principles of international law that are now increasingly violated. We are also witnessing setbacks for human rights, democracy and the rule of law in many countries, with the targeting of political opposition, human rights defenders, journalists and the media threats to the independence of the judiciary and attempts to undermine or blur the separation of powers. These are not and should not be considered merely internal affairs. They touch the core of the rule of law also at the international level, and often lead to further instability in the relevant regions or at global level. Therefore, it is our common duty to take action to prevent this from happening and remain open to dialogue and cooperation to find adequate solutions. In this respect, the Secretary's General Report does not only confirm the pervasive and indispensable role of the UN system and its unwavering commitment to promoting the rule of law globally. It also provides a reminder to all of us, individually and collectively, that we all have an important role to play in upholding the rule of law at home and at the international level. Madam Chair for the European Union the rule of law is a cornerstone of our integration project. As one of our founding values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union. The rule of law is essential to making our societies and economies function while ensuring fundamental rights are protected and corruption is tackled. This is why the rule of law is also a key criterion for candidate countries wishing to join our Union. Over the years we have established and strengthened a robust architecture to address risks and challenges to the rule of law across our member states. These include the EU's rule of law toolbox, which continuously monitors developments and supports member states in their effort to uphold the rule of law. The EU Rule of Law Report, published annually since 2020, examines developments in four key the justice system, the anti corruption framework, media pluralism and media freedom and other institutional issues related to checks and balances. The 2025 report includes concrete recommendations to all EU Member States, building on previous years assessment and addressing new challenges. We have also strengthened our capacity to effectively respond to breaches of the rule of law within the European Union through infringement procedures, the conditionality for the protection of the EU budget, relying of course on the Court of Justice of the eu. In parallel, we continue to refine and expand our EU legislative framework. For example, we are modernizing our current legal framework on combating corruption. Recently we also introduced new instruments to protect media pluralism and freedom of expression. The European Media Freedom act, fully applicable as of August 2025, put in place a new set of rules to protect media pluralism and independence in the eu, ensuring that media, public and private, can operate more easily across borders in the EU internal market without undue pressure and taking into account the digital transformation of the media space. Since May 2024, another new EU legislation, Directive 20241069 has been in place to counter strategic abusive lawsuits against persons who engage in public participation, such as journalists and human rights defenders, including in cross border situation. At the international level. As the magnitude of challenges facing the UN system widens, the units Member States reiterate their support for an effective multilateralism and the international legal order with the UN at its core and oppose efforts to undermine or erode it. This is reflected in our Support for the 2030 Agenda and the achievement of SDG 16 on access to justice for all, as well as in our commitment to the implementation of the Pact for the future and its annexes, which we were pleased to see well referenced in the Secretary General's report. Peace and prosperity as well as the achievement of the SDGs go hand in hand with respect for democracy, the rule of law and all human rights. To be effective, the rule of law requires ensuring international justice and accountability for all violations of international law. We welcome the Report's reference to the role of the International Court of Justice, which the EU strongly supports as one of the main pillars of international justice system. We recall that the ICJ's orders and judgments are binding on the parties to the dispute and must be implemented in full. We also reaffirm our unwavering support for an international criminal justice system, particularly to the International Criminal Court, as well as our commitment to upholding the Rome Statute and preserving the ICC's independence and integrity. We also support the other international criminal courts and tribunals and the other international accountability mechanisms mentioned in the Report and their efforts in completing their workload to ensure international accountability and support international criminal justice. It is also important to learn from their experience and preserve their legacy for future generations. Ensuring accountability may also require setting up new instruments, such as the Register of Damages Caused by the Aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, which is recalled in the report. 44 states, out of which 26 are EU member states and the European Union have become members of the Register of damages. The EU and 26 EU member states have also actively participated in the negotiations on the establishment of an International Claims Commission for Ukraine and of the Special Tribunal on the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. We will continue to work closely with the Council of Europe to finalize these efforts in order to reaffirm our joint commitment to justice, accountability and the international legal order. We call on all UN Member States to join in these efforts as all the underlying instruments are open for cross regional participation of States which support these important accountability efforts. We will also continue to promote and support initiatives aimed at developing international law. The recent achievement of the required threshold of ratifications for the entry into force of the BB&J agreement, a crucial tool to protect our ocean beyond borders, stands as a shining victory for multilateralism. As the Secretary General noted, in two years we turned commitment into action proving what is possible when nations unite for the common good. This should inspire us as we embark on the processes for the negotiation of a Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Humanity and on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters, which we agreed to launch last year in this Committee. As noted in the Report, both processes are based on the work of the International Law Commission. We take this opportunity to reaffirm the important role of the ILC in the codification and development of international law and stress the need for the IHLC to be given sufficient resources to fulfill its mandate. The EU and its member States also remain committed to protecting democracy, including elections, from foreign information manipulation interference by state or non state actors. We will work with partners toward a global strategy for countering foreign information manipulation interference, supporting the UN global principles for information integrity and actively promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms, the Rule of law and democratic principles in the Digital space. Madam Chair, to conclude, the rule of law is essential for the functioning of our societies, economies and international order. It is the foundation on which the EU stands firm. In a world where the international legal order and respect for fundamental rights in democratic systems are increasingly under pressure, we remain steadfast in our commitment to upholding and promoting the rule of law within our borders, in our neighborhood and globally. We look forward to continue to work with the UN actors and all member states to achieve this common goal and build a more just, peaceful and prosperous world for all. We must ensure that at future anniversaries we can celebrate achievements and solutions rather than acknowledge persistent challenges or setbacks. I thank you.
[Speaker A] [9464.880s → 9477.840s]: I thank the distinguished delegate of the European Union for his statement and I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Oman who will be speaking on behalf of the Arab Group. You have the floor.
[Speaker C] [9480.960s → 10250.450s]: Thank you. Madam Chair. Madam Chair, the Arab Group would like to emphasize that the rule of law represents the cornerstone of the guarantee of freedom and justice and equality. It is a key cornerstone in enhancing international peace and security as per the provisions of the first Article of the UN Charter, which emphasizes the need to settle international disputes peacefully in accordance with the principles of international solidarity. The Charter also emphasizes the importance of protecting political and economic and cultural rights and Article 3 of the paragraph 3 of Article 33 emphasizes the importance of such rights. The rule of law nationally and internationally requires respecting the obligations as per paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the charter, which emphasizes that States must fulfill their obligations with intentions and the role of the UN is also emphasized in enhancing States capacities to ensure accountability in accordance with GA resolutions on the rule of law. Madam Chair, the Arab Group calls for an end to the war of genocide and the continuous and systemic violations carried out by the Israeli occupation forces against the Palestinians in occupied Palestinian territory, especially the Gaza Strip. This was all documented in the reports of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Palestinian Occupied Territory. And this is all in the document Ahrch 55, 73 and a number of other reports have also found that there is due reason to believe that the Occupying Power is committing genocide as per the second Article of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide for the year 1948 documents also launched in 2025 have found that there is a clear intention to eliminate an entire category of people on the basis of religion or ethnicity and the Occupying Power is responsible for failing to prevent this genocide and is actually committing genocide and has failed to hold accountable those perpetrating genocide in the Gaza Strip in a flagrant violation of the provisional measures mandated by the ICJ and the Convent on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide. The Group also emphasizes that the documented acts, including the deliberate killing of civilians and clear physical and psychological damage, and forcing collective punishment that is trying to eliminate an entire group, along with measures that make births particularly difficult, all contribute to genocide. And this is also a violation of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, especially Articles 147 and the fourth convention concerned with the protection of civilians in times of war and which also prohibit the destruction of civilian properties. All these grave violations are tantamount to crimes of war. The Occupying Power also violates human rights conventions, including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and the Convention on the Oppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid and the Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Inhuman or Cruel or Humiliating Punishment. Madam Chair, the Arab Group renews its call for an immediate end to the war of genocide against the Gaza Strip. We call for an end to the illegal occupation of the State of Palestine and an end to Israeli aggression against Lebanon and continued hostilities against Syria, including continuous violations of Syria's sovereignty through infiltration of Syrian territory. We also emphasize the importance of protecting civilians and providing urgent humanitarian assistance and preventing the exacerbation of the humanitarian crisis. And we strongly condemn continuous Israeli violations to international rule of law and the orders of the International Court of Justice, in addition to Israel's forced displacement of the Palestinian people and starvation of the Palestinian people in clear violation of the 4 Geneva Convention, Israel's continued illegal occupation and continued violation of the resolutions of the GA and the Security Council, including Resolution 224 and Resolution 338 and Resolution 2334, and the advisory opinion of the ICJ for 2004 with regards to the legal effect of building the Wall, all point to the illegality of the acquisition of land through force, which was also enshrined in Article 2, paragraph 4 of the Charter. And this is all a violation of international law. We also remind of the Advisory opinion of the ICJ in 2024 on the legal implications of the continued occupation of Israel of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which emphasize that the Occupying Power continues to violate the UN Charter and the basic principles of the international law, including the Palestinian people's right to self determination, along with the prohibition of the use of force in international relations and the principle that land may not be acquired through force. All of the makes Israel's presence in a Palestinian territory illegal. And this Occupying Power has an obligation to end its illegal presence as quickly as possible. And it must put an end to all settlement efforts. It must dismantle settlements and remove settlers from Palestinian land. And international law also dictates that the Occupying Power must provide compensation for real and natural persons who have suffered damages. It also has an obligation to enable and empower Palestinian people to exercise the right to self determination. And there must be no recognition of any legitimacy of the continued Israeli presence in Occupied Palestinian territory. There must be no assistance that prolongs this situation. This would eventually lead to entire to the full Israeli withdrawal from Occupied Palestinian territory. This would also lead to compliance with the measures dictated by the icj. And this would lead to the justice we aspire to in accordance with relevant UN resolutions. Madam Chair, the Arab Group is emphasizing the importance of holding accountable the Occupying Power for all its crimes against the Palestinian people, including before the ICJ and all relevant legal mechanisms. The Arab Group emphasizes that accountability represents a part and parcel of the principle of the rule of international law. And the current case by South Africa against Israel as the Occupying Power that is violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of genocide of 1948 is proof that the international community is able to prevent impunity. And we emphasize that any attempts to displace Palestinians from their lands will be responded to very firmly as this crime is condemnable and unacceptable. And it is also in accordance with the Fourth Geneva Convention. And if Israel continues with impunity, this will drag the entire region into a regional war and further violence. And we emphasize that the impacts will not exclusively affect our region. They will spill over to a much larger area. We commend the measures taken by some countries based on their effort, their obligations under international law, including sanctions and limiting relations with the authorities of the occupation. In response to grave violations in Palestine, we call upon all countries to take similar measures in order to put an end to the siege and protect civilians. The Group emphasizes the importance of implementing Resolution 2730 which mandates the protection of those working in the humanitarian field and which condemns attacks against the UNRWA as a clear violation of the hundredth article of the UN Charter which mandates the independence and protection of staff working for the un. And we also condemn Israel's Latest statements that declare the UNRWA terrorist organization which is an infringement upon the immunities and privileges according to the UN in accordance with the relevant Convention. And we also remind recall the unalienable rights, inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including the rights of self determination and right of return and right to independence, in accordance with the advisory opinions of the ICJ and other relevant bodies. Madam Chair, we emphasize that the protection of international sovereignty is important and double standards in the implementation of international law undermine multilateralism. We also warn against any attempts to politicize international humanitarian law or any use of this law in violation of the principles of equality before the law. We welcome the adoption of the New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Palestinian Question. And we commend the efforts of France and Saudi Arabia in their leadership of this Conference. We assure you of our support for countries doing mediation efforts such as Qatar and Egypt and the us. This is to put an end to the aggression against the Gaza strike. The Group also welcomes the sincere efforts of the American President Donald Trump and his call upon Israel, the occupying power, to put an end to its strikes immediately and to reach a comprehensive agreement that guarantees the unhindered provision of humanitarian assistance to the people in Gaza as guarantees that people will not be displaced from Gaza without also anything that would undermine the protection of civilians. This would also guarantee the total return of hostages and the total withdrawal of Israel from Gaza, which would allow authorities to retake control of Gaza and to reunify Gaza and the West Bank. And this would also allow for a mechanism that allows the protection of Palestinian people's rights. And we emphasize that the achievement of these objectives is a key step towards putting an end to the occupation and guaranteeing the independence of Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital. This would allow just and inclusive peace on the basis of the two state solution in line with international law. In conclusion, we reaffirm that the rule of law is not an abstract principle, but rather is a moral and legal obligation. And the international community's inability to protect people in Gaza and in Lebanon is a collective failure of the international community to apply the first article of the Geneva Conventions, which makes it incumbent upon countries to respect the rule of law under all circumstances. Thank you, Madam Chair.
[Speaker A] [10256.850s → 11044.680s]: We thank the distinguished delegate of Oman, speaking on behalf of the Arab Group. Thank you for your statement. Next we give the floor to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, who is speaking on behalf of the Group of Friends in defence of the Charter of the United Nations. You have the floor. Thank you very much. Madam Chair, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has the honour of taking the floor on behalf of the Group of Friends in defence of the UN Charter Chair we reiterate the importance of the commitment to of all States to the United Nations Charter, including its principles and purposes, as well as to the rule of law and fundamental elements such as the principle of sovereign equality, the duty of States to comply in good faith with obligations contrived therein pursuant by the UN Charter, the obligation to respect the sovereign and legal rights of States pursuant to international law and the provisions of the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among States in accordance with the United Nations Charter. Bearing all of this in mind, it would be irresponsible on our part to address this agenda item without referring to the current situation in the Middle East. In this regard, we wish to seize this opportunity to express our most profound concern over the ongoing attempts by Israel, the Occupying Power, to ignite and cause the Middle Eastern region as a whole to explode. As they have shown, among other things, through their repeated and grave violations of international law, including their provocations and violations of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of countries of the region, this shows their intention to aggravate tensions on the ground at the expense of the human rights of the Palestinian people as well as other Arab peoples of the occupied territories and other peoples in the region. It goes without saying that these aggressions, including the genocide that is unfolding in Palestine, are a clear and deliberate affront to the rule of law, both nationally as well as internationally. Currently, the rule of law is in danger due to the brutal and unbridled attack attacks by Israel against the Palestinians and other peoples in the region. Israel, the Occupying Power, has killed more than 65,000 people, including women and children. Israel has also injured thousands more, and many people are still buried under the rubble. Israel has displaced millions of people in addition to deliberately cutting their access to essential humanitarian aid, food, water and shelter. The rule of law would be nothing but words expressed in complete ignorance if the international community as a whole didn't re establish beginning by the immediate halt to the attacks and the horrendous and atrocious crimes perpetrated by Israel against innocent civilians in Gaza and beyond. We continue to most strongly condemn the atrocious crimes committed by Israel against the Palestinian people and other peoples in the region. And we reiterate that the international community must not allow Israel, the Occupying Power, to act with impunity. The international community must demand that Israel be held fully accountable and bring them to justice for all of the crimes that they have perpetrated. Madam Chair, the Group of Friends in defence of the United Nations Charter condemns and denounces in the most strongest terms possible the atrocious, unjustifiable and premeditated attack perpetrated by Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran on 13 June 2025 where we saw a series of coordinated large scale attacks, including airstrikes against many locations in Iran which led, among other things, to the death and injury of hundreds of civilians, including women and children, as well as scientists, university professors and high level Iranian civil servants, some of them alongside members of their families whilst they were in their homes. The Member States of the Group of Friends and defense of the UN Charter strongly condemned the deliberate attacks by Israel against civilians and areas populated by civilians where millions of people live and insist that persistent, systematic and widespread attacks against women and children, the grave physical injuries inflicted against them and the military attacks against residential areas, as well as the assets and properties of civilians by Israel as part of their criminal actions in the region, including their recent attacks against the Islamic Republic of Iran, are proof once again of the total disregard on the part of Israel for any law, norm or even the mens rea of the commission of such brutal crimes. The Group of Friends also condemns the deliberate attacks against Iranian officials and scientists and we also call out the Israeli attacks against Iranian nuclear facilities that are used for peaceful purposes. The Group expresses its profound concern over the fact that these brutal attacks and harm are causing a grave risk of radioactive material being released and are a grave threat to the civilian population and the environment. And at the same time we express our concern over the fact that the Israeli attacks continue to compromise the security of civil aviation in the region. In this context we underscore that these reprehensible attacks constitute fragrant violations of the United Nations Charter of international law and including of international human rights law and international humanitarian law and also gravely violate the fundamental principles of international law, including the sovereignty, territorial integrity and the prohibition of the threat or the use of force against the territorial integrity and political independence of States. Madam Chair, given all of the above, we wish to seize this opportunity to express our profound concern over the ongoing threats to the United Nations Charter derived, among other things, to neo colonial practices that some Governments use to try and exercise their domination over sovereign and independent states in flames. Flagrant violation of the fundamental principles enshrined in the UN Charter, the increasingly frequent, systematic and unprecedented imposition of unilateral coercive measures and attempts to establish the so called rules based order, which is a vague notion that has the potential to undermine the rule of law internationally as well as the principles and purposes enshrined in the UN Charter, which today is the only system of universally accepted norms that govern international relations. UCMS are clear examples of such threats. In this context, ucms have become de facto an increasingly cruel and destructive instrument. We cannot continue to minimize or ignore this problem since these cruel measures are used deliberately to cause pain and suffering, as an instrument to promote interventionist destabilizing agendas, as well as in order to exacerbate current crises, the current multifaceted global crises. UCMS are illegal and inhumane instruments to promote illegitimate objectives of foreign policy and to exert political, economic and financial pressure on sovereign, independent nations, especially in the developing worlds. They have a direct and intentional impact on development and can be as lethal as conventional weapons. UCMs are a significant violation of human rights and a crime against humanity, bearing in mind that their mere use intentionally deprives entire populations of their basic livelihoods. In this regard, we underscore that no state or group of States has the authority to deprive another State or any other group of States of their legal rights for political purposes. The application of the principles and norms of international law, generally recognized in good faith, excludes the practice of double morals or standards and the imposition by any State or group of States of their will onto another State or another group of States, including through the illegal imposition of ucms. International relations must be based on the rule of law and the principles enshrined in the founding Charter of this organization, whose provisions are grounded in the promotion of peace and international security, the rule of law, economic development and social progress, unilateral and selective approaches, double standards and exceptionalist thought and supremacist thought must must end once and for all. Under international law, no State or no group of States have the authority to provide another State or any other group of States of their legitimate legal rights for political and purely unfair and illegitimate purposes. Madam Chair, the Group of Friends concludes by reaffirming its commitment to not spare any effort to preserve, promote and defend the validity and enforcement of the UN Charter and the rule of law both nationally and internationally. Madam Chair, if we may, on our national capacity, we wish to reiterate our condemnation of the flagrant violation of the international rule of law on the part of the Government of the United States of America by way of their current campaign of harassment and aggression against our country, which we're seeing today being manifested through an unjustified and unprecedented military deployment that includes the use of nuclear assets seeking to threaten both the territorial integrity and political independence of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela as well as the peace and security of the Latin American and Caribbean region. This is another undeniable violation of the UN Charter and of all norms of international law. We strongly reject these hostile policies as well as all irresponsible actions and provocations on behalf of the US Government that are clearly geared towards fabricating the conditions that would enable them to falsely invoke Article 51 of the charter. The US government is using the notorious doctrine of unwilling or unable state and have been repeatedly invoking Article 51 of the Charter in order to justify in a growing arbitrary and concerning way aggressions that the aggressions that they are regularly committing against third States. There are so many examples that we could cite that could easily confirm that alongside Israel, the United States today are one of the main threats to international peace and security. We conclude by launching an appeal to responsible members of the international community to remain alert to these interventionalist plans that based on the invocation of exceptionalist notions and of their own interpretations of the UN Charter, seek to undermine the independence and national sovereignty of the the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela as part of an operation that in the future could be used against any other free, independent and sovereign nation that refuses to give in to the blackmailing and pressure of the US regime. Therefore, we must not get this wrong. We must say that it is time to stop the ongoing aggression of the United States and this is the only way not only of strengthening but also preserving the rule of law internationally. Thank you very much. We thank the distinguished representative of Venezuela for her statement. And we now give the floor to the distinguished Permanent Representative. Sorry, the distinguished DPR of the Philippines on behalf of asean. Your Excellency, you have the floor.
[Speaker G] [11044.680s → 11392.310s]: Madam Chair, I have the honor to deliver this statement on the behalf of the 10 member states of the association of Southeast Asian Nation ASEAN. Brunei, Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to upholding multilateralism as well as the rule of law and a rules based international order. In responding to increasingly complex global challenges. ASEAN thanks the Secretary General for his report on strengthening and coordinating United nations rule of law activities contained in document A, 1899. The report highlights the work of the UN in terms of strengthening and coordinating rule of law activities at national and international levels as well as the UN support to its member states in promoting rule of law activities globally. The report concludes that the rule of law is the bedrock of multilateralism and a foundation for just and peaceful societies. Madam Chair, our world today is facing increasingly complex and cross cutting challenges, including challenges the rule of law among nations on almost all fronts. The need to uphold the rule of law has never been as urgent as now. ASEAN has embraced and continues to promote the rule of law in all its aspects and affirms its commitment to peace and security, good governance and the promotion and protection of human rights enshrined as fundamental principles. Purposes of the ASEAN Charter As a rules based intergovernmental organization, ASEAN has long been committed to stability and security in the region. Important treaties, declaration and documents have paved the way for our success, including ASEAN's founding document, the ASEAN Declaration or Bangkok Declaration of 1967, the ASEAN Charter, which entered into force since 2008 the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in southeast Asia of 1976 and the treaty on the Southeast Asian Nuclear Weapon free zone of 1995, the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea of 2002, the Declaration of the East Asia Summit on the Principles for Mutually beneficial relations of 2011 and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration of 2012 together with the Phnom Penh Statement on its adoption. ASEAN Member States continue to work with China towards the early conclusion of an effective and substantive code of conduct in the South China Sea consistent with the international law, including the 1982 UNCLOS within a mutually agreed timeline. Madam Chair, ASEAN welcomes the subtopic of the debate under this agenda item at the present session the rule of law at the national and international levels at the 80th anniversary of the United Nations. In this regard, ASEAN reaffirms the importance of upholding international law, including UNCLOS as well as ASEAN shared values and norms as enshrined in the ASEAN Charter, the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in southeast Asia, the 2011 Declaration of the East Asia Summit on the Principles of Mutually Beneficial Relations or the Bali Principles and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo Pacific. ASEAN further reaffirms our commitment to strengthening the ASEAN community and our shared commitment to maintaining and promoting peace, security and stability in the region, as well as the peaceful resolution of disputes, including full respect for legal and diplomatic processes, without resorting to the threat or use of force in accordance with the universally recognized principles and of the international law, including the 1982 UNC laws. ASEAN is of the view that capacity building remains critical for the promotion of the rule of law as well as for the purpose of ensuring effective, inclusive and accountable justice institutions. In this connection, we welcome and look forward to the continued support of the United nations in carrying out activities under the United Nations Program of Assistance in the teaching, study, dissemination and wider appreciation of international law law. We also wish to express our appreciation to the Treaty Section of the UN Office of Legal affairs for conducting the Regional Workshop on Treaty Law and Practice for ASEAN Member State that was held in November 2024 in Singapore. Before I conclude, I would like to highlight that ASEAN Political Security Community Blueprint 2025 seeks to promote a rules based, people oriented and people centered community and the rule of law at the national and international levels by nurturing the culture of integrity and anti corruption among the people in our region. By instilling these principles into the policies and practice of the ASEAN Community, ASEAN strives to promote these objectives through the implementation of relevant instruments as appropriate, such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, notably Goal 16 on Peace, justice and strong Institutions. ASEAN would like to reaffirm its commitment to good governance, accessible institutions, transparency and accountability. ASEAN strongly believes that this approach will further promote respect for the rule of law at the national and international levels which will contribute to greater socio economic development, peace, justice and prosperity for all. Thank you, Madam Chair. Muchas gracias, porsua.
[Speaker A] [11392.470s → 11468.980s]: Thank you, your Excellency for your statement. Distinguished Delegates, the distinguished Permanent DPR of the Philippines was the last speaker for this agenda item this morning. The State Committee will consider its consideration of agenda item 84, the rule of law at the national and international levels at 3pm where we will be inviting the Deputy Secretary General to make a statement. Delegates are informed that the meeting will start at 3pm sharp since Ms. Amina Mohammed will speak precisely at that moment. Thank you very much. Have a good lunch. The meeting is adjourned. It sa.